Ministry puts nannies at risk
Our family employs a nanny to help take care of our children. She anxiously told us that she and others in her position were required to attend a weekend job training session, and that if she did not attend, she could be disqualified from doing her job.
As working nannies, the attendees are all looking after babies and young children, and some of them could have up to four children on their hands — none of whom have been vaccinated, given that the minimum age for COVID-19 vaccination in Taiwan is 12.
At a time when COVID-19 is spreading fast, our nanny and others were worried about the risks associated with a large cluster of people attending an in-person training session.
I believe that parents are just as worried as their nannies are, so I told the Kaohsiung City Government that I thought the training should be done online instead. However, a staff member at Kaohsiung’s Social Affairs Bureau said that these nanny courses receive central government funding and it is up to the Ministry of Health and Welfare to decide what form they take.
The staff member said that various counties and cities have raised the issue with the ministry, but it said that it would collect related information and hold a meeting next month to consider whether the in-person courses that are being held all over Taiwan should be done online instead.
Just as COVID-19 is breaking out all over Taiwan, the central government’s reaction is to wait until May before holding a meeting and deciding what to do about these training sessions. This is the response given by a subordinate office of the health ministry, which is in charge of fighting COVID-19.
Nannies visit many homes, so if there is any risk of infection, they have the potential to set off community outbreaks just as scattered sparks ignite a prairie fire. All the more so because the infants and toddlers in their care are all unvaccinated.
If any person who attends an in-person training course is later confirmed to have COVID-19 or to have been in contact with a confirmed case, all the nannies who take part in the session might need to undergo health self-management or isolation, causing an immediate problem for all the families involved and the care of their children.
Is this a price that the health ministry is prepared to pay? Are the health minister and ministry staff willing to help parents all over Taiwan look after their children?
Yang Chih-cheng
Kaohsiung
WHA can learn from Taiwan
I applaud a recent comment by US Deputy Secretary of State Brian McKeon urging WHO Secretary-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to grant Taiwan observer status at its upcoming 75th World Health Assembly (WHA) from May 22 to 28 (“US official presses WHO for Taiwan to participate at WHA,” April 10, page 2).
Taiwan held observer status at annual WHA meetings between 2009 and 2016. Since 2017, the WHO has refused to invite Taiwan to attend the WHA due to opposition from China.
Taiwan could offer valuable contributions and lessons learned from its approach to global health security issues, and WHO leadership and all responsible nations should recognize that excluding the interests of 23.9 million people at the WHA serves only to imperil Taiwan and the US’ shared global health objectives.
Nevertheless, I was grateful to see that the US supports Taiwan’s meaningful participation in WHO forums and the WHA, as the international community should be able to benefit from the experience of all partners, including Taiwan’s successful contribution to tackling the COVID-19 pandemic.
Global health and its security challenges do not respect borders nor recognize political disputes. There is no reasonable justification for Taiwan’s continued exclusion from this forum, as the international community would appreciate the value of Taiwan’s expertise, resources and dynamism in the international community, which can be elevated through meaningful participation in international organizations.
Kent Wang
Washington
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS