On March 30, the National Development Council and five ministries released a road map for achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, detailing four major transformations, including energy transformation, and 12 key strategies for achieving the goal.
The issues involved are complicated and intermeshed. Finance, the lifeblood of the real economy, is certain to play an important role. Some international examples might clarify how it might work in practice.
The biggest highlight of the COP26 climate summit in November last year was the establishment of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, with its commitment to building new business models that lend or invest in net-zero assets to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, with a medium-term target for 2030. More than 450 financial institutions — with assets of up to US$130 trillion — have so far signed up to the program.
Alliance members have committed to considering their clients’ emissions targets as their own. Financial institutions are to take their total emissions and emission levels as the inspection standard, meaning that in addition to reducing carbon emissions at their own business offices, they must consider the emissions data of customers and investments. The aim is to drive all of society toward net-zero emissions.
Starting in June, the European Banking Authority (EBA) is to require banks to disclose their “green asset ratio” as a key performance indicator of sustainable finance. The higher their percentage of investments and loans supporting the transformation to green energy, the higher their performance rating.
Specific EBA projects include the manufacturing of equipment using renewable resources, the manufacturing of transportation vehicles using low-carbon processes, the manufacturing of energy-efficient residential equipment and hydrogen production equipment, power generation using renewable resources, energy storage, low-energy buildings, low-energy data centers and the removal of carbon dioxide.
The EBA is also assessing whether banks that lend to companies with high carbon emissions and high energy consumption should calculate the loans using a higher risk weighting, which would increase the cost of such loans.
The EU is encouraging banks to lend to the green energy industry and has begun to call in loans to industries with high carbon emissions — a two-pronged approach.
That is why Bill Gates in November last year said that he and his foundation had divested stocks related to fossil fuels, as those companies would soon lose value.
The theme of this year’s International Earth Day, which falls on Friday next week, is “Invest in Our Planet.” In addition to highlighting the seriousness of environmental issues such as climate change, it is hoped that finance would lead other industries in facilitating energy transition.
Honda Chen is head of the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance’s sustainable finance office.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS