Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) confrontation with Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) on Wednesday backfired, with people posting thousands of comments on her Facebook page showing support for the head of the Central Epidemic Command Center — as the KMT once again demonstrated that it is out of touch with the nation.
“I’m with you, minister A-chung (阿中),” many posts read, referring to a common nickname for Chen, while others criticized Cheng, after their heated exchange at a meeting of the legislature’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee.
A group of KMT legislators protested the meeting to review the lifting of a ban on imports of food from five Japanese prefectures implemented after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster. With Cheng standing in front of the minister, they shouted that the government should stand up to Japan and criticized the center’s COVID-19 policies, saying that “800 people have died from the pandemic and you [Chen] did not take responsibility.”
The minister asked Cheng not to disparage healthcare workers and said that Taiwan’s COVID-19 deaths were relatively few compared with other countries, but the legislator interrupted, saying that deaths in Taiwan were linked to the center’s vaccine policy. A visibly angry Chen called her remarks far-fetched and said she had gone too far. He later said it was unfair to discount people’s efforts to fight COVID-19, adding that she should “look at the world, and think about Taiwan.”
Cheng’s remarks might have been an attempt to shore up support from the pan-blue camp, but they highlight how out of touch the KMT is with Taiwanese and the party’s ignorance about the global COVID-19 situation. The KMT is trying to undermine people’s confidence in the government’s disease prevention policies and often opposes the government just for the sake of it.
In the past two years, the KMT said the government was inhumane for banning mask exports, urging it to donate them to China; claimed the government was blindly expanding mask production to benefit local manufacturers; and often called for Chen to be replaced. The party magnified concerns over the possible adverse reactions to AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine, but later criticized the government for not securing enough doses, while calling on it to import vaccines from China.
KMT legislators are using the same tactics on foreign affairs. KMT Legislator Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) last week called South Korean president-elect Yoon Suk-yeol’s vow to increase the deployment of its anti-missile defense system and enhance relations with Japan and the US “inappropriate,” as it provokes China.
KMT Legislator Sra Kacaw (鄭天財) on Wednesday said a proposal to compete at the 2024 Paris Summer Olympics as “Taiwan” should not be put to a referendum, as China would use it as grounds to attack Taiwan. He added that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy made similar policy mistakes leading to the deaths of Ukrainians.
The KMT also called the government’s statements that it would cooperate with US and EU sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine “meaningless.” A few days later, the KMT changed its tune, saying it supported international efforts to end the war.
With its inability to distinguish friend from foe — urging the government to stand up to Tokyo and stand with Beijing, despite Japan donating millions of COVID-19 vaccine doses, while China repeatedly flies warplanes into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone and blocks the nation’s participation in international organizations — it is no wonder, as recent opinion polls show, the KMT is quickly losing support.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS