Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) confrontation with Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) on Wednesday backfired, with people posting thousands of comments on her Facebook page showing support for the head of the Central Epidemic Command Center — as the KMT once again demonstrated that it is out of touch with the nation.
“I’m with you, minister A-chung (阿中),” many posts read, referring to a common nickname for Chen, while others criticized Cheng, after their heated exchange at a meeting of the legislature’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee.
A group of KMT legislators protested the meeting to review the lifting of a ban on imports of food from five Japanese prefectures implemented after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster. With Cheng standing in front of the minister, they shouted that the government should stand up to Japan and criticized the center’s COVID-19 policies, saying that “800 people have died from the pandemic and you [Chen] did not take responsibility.”
The minister asked Cheng not to disparage healthcare workers and said that Taiwan’s COVID-19 deaths were relatively few compared with other countries, but the legislator interrupted, saying that deaths in Taiwan were linked to the center’s vaccine policy. A visibly angry Chen called her remarks far-fetched and said she had gone too far. He later said it was unfair to discount people’s efforts to fight COVID-19, adding that she should “look at the world, and think about Taiwan.”
Cheng’s remarks might have been an attempt to shore up support from the pan-blue camp, but they highlight how out of touch the KMT is with Taiwanese and the party’s ignorance about the global COVID-19 situation. The KMT is trying to undermine people’s confidence in the government’s disease prevention policies and often opposes the government just for the sake of it.
In the past two years, the KMT said the government was inhumane for banning mask exports, urging it to donate them to China; claimed the government was blindly expanding mask production to benefit local manufacturers; and often called for Chen to be replaced. The party magnified concerns over the possible adverse reactions to AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine, but later criticized the government for not securing enough doses, while calling on it to import vaccines from China.
KMT legislators are using the same tactics on foreign affairs. KMT Legislator Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) last week called South Korean president-elect Yoon Suk-yeol’s vow to increase the deployment of its anti-missile defense system and enhance relations with Japan and the US “inappropriate,” as it provokes China.
KMT Legislator Sra Kacaw (鄭天財) on Wednesday said a proposal to compete at the 2024 Paris Summer Olympics as “Taiwan” should not be put to a referendum, as China would use it as grounds to attack Taiwan. He added that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy made similar policy mistakes leading to the deaths of Ukrainians.
The KMT also called the government’s statements that it would cooperate with US and EU sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine “meaningless.” A few days later, the KMT changed its tune, saying it supported international efforts to end the war.
With its inability to distinguish friend from foe — urging the government to stand up to Tokyo and stand with Beijing, despite Japan donating millions of COVID-19 vaccine doses, while China repeatedly flies warplanes into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone and blocks the nation’s participation in international organizations — it is no wonder, as recent opinion polls show, the KMT is quickly losing support.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS