Retired major general Han Yu-ping (韓豫平), who served as chief of staff of the army’s Hualien and Taitung Defense Command, six years ago was accused of misappropriating NT$2,880 from a bonus payment fund for troops taking part in the Han Kuang exercises to pay for a meal.
The Hualien branch of the Taiwan High Court on July 31, 2020, sentenced Han to four years and six months in prison for corruption, and the Supreme Court rejected his appeal on Feb. 14.
This “embezzlement of public funds” involves a tiny sum. Setting aside whether Han intended to commit a crime, law enforcement officials should consider whether it was necessary to file corruption charges over such an insignificant amount.
This raises the question of whether minor offenses should be decriminalized. If social values lead most people to think there is no need to ascribe guilt for some minor offenses, it could save judicial resources while meeting the general public’s expectations regarding the law.
According to the basic principles of criminal law, for something to constitute a crime, the objective behavior must meet the elements specified in the law, and it must involve illegality, as well as intent or negligence.
Negligent behavior is, in principle, not punishable, unless the law specifically states that it is.
Traditional theory holds that the difference between a minor and a major offense is a matter of the severity of the sentence that applies to them, not whether they constitute a crime. Thus, a minor offense is still a crime.
However, this approach is being revised in some countries.
Japanese jurists have proposed the concept of “substantive illegality,” according to which, although an objective act constitutes a crime under the law, if the circumstances of the act are minor, and refraining from punishing the offender would not be contrary to ordinary people’s social values, the act is not considered a crime.
Japanese judicial practice adopts this view.
There are similar sentiments in the Taiwanese legal system.
Judgement No. 4225 of 1985 of the Supreme Court states: “Although the act meets the regulations as regards the elements of a crime, if there is no substantial illegality, it can hardly constitute a crime.”
This judgement was made in a case of criminal conversion, ie, misappropriation, where because the thing misappropriated was of very little value, the court deemed that it did not constitute a crime.
The reasoning for this judgement is as follows: “The accused’s infringement of legal interests and his act were so minor that, in accordance with general social ethics, one could hardly think that it was necessary to impose a criminal penalty. Furthermore, if no prosecution and penalty are imposed with regard to this act, it would not run contrary to the legal order of social communal life. Consequently, it should be regarded as not having any substantial illegality, and therefore need not be restrained or punished by means of the law.”
The situation is similar on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
Article 13 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China states that “if the circumstances are obviously minor and the harm done is not serious, the act shall not be considered a crime.”
These examples show that it is established practice in criminal law that minor offenses do not constitute crimes.
Taiwan’s system of trial and prosecution are such that it would indeed be possible to decriminalize minor offenses. The next step should be to legislate specific regulations to this effect. This would clear up an imperfection in Taiwan’s legal system.
Hsu Wun-pin is a lawyer and honorary chairman of the Taipei-based Chinese Association for Human Rights.
Translated by Julian Clegg
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS