For several weeks, US and UK intelligence agencies have been warning that the Kremlin might be planning a “false flag” operation against Ukraine which would give the more than 100,000 Russian troops massed on the Ukraine border casus belli to invade the country on the grounds of protecting ethnic Russians.
As sure as eggs are eggs, last week a Ukrainian nursery school in the breakaway Donbas region was hit by artillery fire. The leader of the Donbas separatist government immediately said that Ukrainian forces had shelled the nursery, while Kyiv blamed Russian forces for the attack and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggested he had seen intelligence showing the Kremlin had engineered the attack.
Yesterday, Russian President Vladimir Putin crossed the Rubicon. In a televised address to the nation, he called Ukraine a US puppet, officially recognized the independence of Ukraine’s breakaway regions, and declared the Ukrainian state a historical error and a fiction. Putin issued an ultimatum to Kyiv: Immediately cease military combat action against the breakaway regions or accept full responsibility for any subsequent bloodshed, and ordered Russian troops on the border to perform “peacekeeping functions” in the breakaway regions.
A military takeover now appears imminent and might already be under way. The US has pulled out all remaining embassy staff from Ukraine and other nations have followed suit.
Putin has played a long game and is essentially finishing the job that he started in 2014 with Crimea. His goal is to stymie any eastward expansion of the EU and NATO up to Russia’s western border, reinstall a pro-Russian puppet regime and turn Ukraine into a buffer state.
There are several striking parallels between Russia’s strategy toward Ukraine and China’s designs on Taiwan.
China, like Russia, also subscribes to a revanchist foreign policy. Beijing views Taiwan as a lost territory that must be united under its “one China” principle to achieve the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” Beijing also views Taiwan as a US puppet and a national security threat sitting off its east coast that must be neutralized.
China’s and Russia’s infiltration and destabilization tactics are also surprisingly similar. The Kremlin has been fomenting unrest in Ukraine for years, using what it calls “active measures” to set ethnic Russians against Ukrainians, weaken the authority of the Ukrainian government and erode national unity.
China’s “united front” tactics follow essentially the same strategy: infiltrate every corner of Taiwanese society — politics, commerce, Buddhist temples and even criminal gangs — to drive a wedge between benshengren (本省人) — the people who came to Taiwan before World War II and their offspring — and waishengren (外省人) — those who came from China with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) after the war and their offspring.
China has also emulated the “gray zone” tactics first employed by Russia during the annexation of Crimea in 2014. Moscow deployed “little green men” — Russian troops without insignia on their uniforms, who could fight alongside separatists while affording Moscow plausible deniability.
Since then, Beijing has emulated these tactics in the airspace and in the waters around Taiwan. This has included developing a maritime militia of “little blue men” and, earlier this month, using a civilian plane to buzz Taiwanese sovereign airspace above Dongyin Island (東引) in the Matsu (馬祖) archipelago.
Given Beijing’s track record of emulating Russian strategy and tactics, the unfolding situation in Ukraine — and the West’s response to it — will be monitored closely on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS