On the eve of the Lunar New Year on Jan. 31, the Vatican announced that the pope had appointed Archbishop-elect Arnaldo Catalan — the charge d’affaires at the Holy See’s Embassy to the Republic of China in Taipei — to be its new ambassador, or apostolic nuncio, to Rwanda effective this month. Taiwan once again faces a situation in which the Holy See has no ambassador or charge d’affaires stationed in Taipei.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s Ambassador to the Holy See, Matthew Lee (李世明), received a three-year extension of his posting, which expired in November last year. A Taiwanese diplomat can be stationed in a particular location for up to six years, extended by three years depending on need, according to Ministry of Foreign Affairs guidelines. A posting cannot last for longer than nine years. This means that Lee cannot be assigned to the Holy See beyond the end of 2024.
This, together with China’s meddling in relations between Taiwan and the Vatican, and the continuing progress in relations between China and the Holy See, could lead to a shift in relations with Taiwan’s only diplomatic partner in Europe. We must therefore pay close attention to any changes that might take place.
The ongoing dispute between Ukraine and Russia, along with increasingly frequent intrusions by China’s military and civilian aircraft into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone, have led to increasingly tense relations across the Taiwan Strait. China might use this time of international tensions to rob Taiwan of its only European diplomatic partner — the Holy See — be it to put a brake on Taiwan’s diplomatic successes or to retaliate for Lithuania’s friendly diplomatic gestures toward Taiwan.
There are 12 million Catholics in China, compared with 200,000 in Taiwan, so the Vatican must devote more effort to the pastoral care of Chinese Catholics — especially with regard to their lack of religious freedom, and the restrictions and imprisonment that they could face, which are problems that Pope Francis and senior Vatican officials must always be concerned about.
On Sept. 22, 2018, following four years of bilateral consultations between the Holy See and China, the Vatican’s Secretariat for Relations with States and China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs signed the Provisional Agreement Between the Holy See and the People’s Republic of China Concerning the Nomination of Bishops, which was originally valid for two years.
On Feb. 14, 2020, Vatican Secretary for Relations with States Archbishop Paul Gallagher and Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) held a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference. It was the first ministerial meeting between the two sides since 1952, when communist China expelled all Vatican diplomats.
In October 2020, the authoritative Jesuit magazine America reported that the Holy See might be planning for a meeting between Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強), and that it hoped to open a permanent representative office in Beijing, as well as sending official delegations to China.
On Oct. 22 of the same year, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian (趙立堅) announced that the interim agreement on the nomination of bishops would be extended by two years, which would take it to Sept. 22 this year.
Given the dynamics of the Holy See’s China-oriented diplomatic trajectory, it is difficult to find any reason for it to stop moving in that direction. Therefore, Taiwan must make efforts to attain a better diplomatic arrangement between the Holy See and Taiwan, or even to revive the arrangement advocated by the Holy See under Pope Paul VI at the UN in 1965, whereby the “two Chinas” would join the international community at the same time.
Could the upcoming rotations of ambassadors or charges d’affaires between Taiwan and the Holy See pose a risk to continued bilateral relations? Who might be Taiwan’s next ambassador of the Republic of China to the Holy See?
The posting must be assigned to someone who understands the Vatican’s missions in China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and the greater China region, and who has the political stature needed to stand up and speak up for Taiwan.
How should Taiwan respond to closer diplomatic relations between the Holy See and China? Taiwan’s government and foreign affairs departments should give serious thought to all these questions.
For Taiwan’s foreign ministry, the Holy See might not be as important as the US and Japan, but losing diplomatic ties with the Vatican would be a symbolic blow to Taiwan’s foreign relations.
Thomas Tu’s master’s thesis is titled The Holy See’s Diplomacy: The Mission to Divided and Disputed Nations.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS