At some of the world’s most sensitive spots, authorities have installed security screening devices made by a single Chinese company with deep ties to China’s military and the highest levels of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Europe’s largest ports, airports from Amsterdam to Athens and NATO’s borders with Russia all depend on equipment manufactured by Nuctech Co (同方威視技術), which has quickly become the world’s leading company, by revenue, for cargo and vehicle scanners.
Nuctech has been frozen out of the US for years due to national security concerns, but it has made deep inroads across Europe, installing its devices in 26 of 27 EU member states, public procurement, government and corporate records reviewed by The Associated Press showed.
The complexity of Nuctech’s ownership structure and its expanding global footprint have raised alarms on both sides of the Atlantic.
A growing number of Western security officials and policymakers fear that China could exploit Nuctech equipment to sabotage key transit points or gain illicit access to government, industrial or personal data from the items that pass through its devices.
Nuctech’s critics allege that the Chinese government has effectively subsidized the company so that it can undercut competitors and give Beijing potential sway over critical infrastructure in the West as China seeks to establish itself as a global technology superpower.
“The data being processed by these devices is very sensitive. It’s personal data, military data, cargo data. It might be trade secrets at stake. You want to make sure it’s in right hands,” said European Parliament Member Bart Groothuis, who was previously director of cybersecurity at the Dutch Ministry of Defense.
“You’re dependent on a foreign actor which is a geopolitical adversary and strategic rival,” Groothuis said.
He and others have said that Europe does not have tools in place to monitor and resist such potential encroachment.
Different member states have taken opposing views on Nuctech’s security risks. No one has even been able to make a comprehensive public tally of where and how many Nuctech devices have been installed across the continent.
Nuctech dismisses those concerns, countering that its European operations comply with local laws, including strict security checks and data privacy rules.
“It’s our equipment, but it’s your data. Our customer decides what happens with the data,” said Robert Bos, deputy general manager of Nuctech in the Netherlands, where the company has a research and development center.
He said Nuctech is a victim of unfounded allegations that have cut its market share in Europe by nearly half since 2019.
“It’s quite frustrating to be honest,” Bos aid. “In the 20 years we delivered this equipment we never had issues of breaches or data leaks. Till today we never had any proof of it.”
In addition to scanning systems for people, baggage and cargo, the company makes explosives detectors and interconnected devices capable of facial recognition, body temperature measurement and identification card or ticket identification.
Critics say that under China’s national intelligence laws, which require Chinese companies to surrender data requested by state security agencies, Nuctech would be unable to resist calls from Beijing to hand over sensitive data about the cargo, people and devices that pass through its scanners.
They say there is a risk Beijing could use Nuctech’s presence across Europe to gather big data about cross-border trade flows, pull information from local networks, such as shipping manifests or passenger information, or sabotage trade flows in a conflict.
Airports in Amsterdam, Athens, Brussels and London, as well as Florence, Pisa and Venice in Italy, Geneva and Zurich in Switzerland and more than a dozen across Spain have all signed deals for Nuctech equipment, procurement and government documents, and corporate announcements showed.
Nuctech’s ownership structure is so complex that can be difficult for outsiders to understand the true lines of influence and accountability.
What is clear is that Nuctech, from its very origins, has been tied to Chinese government, academic and military interests.
Nuctech was founded as an offshoot of Tsinghua University, an elite public research university in Beijing. It grew with backing from the Chinese government and for years was run by the son of former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
Datenna, a Dutch economic intelligence company focused on China, mapped the ownership structure of Nuctech and found a dozen major entities across four layers of shareholding, including four state-owned enterprises and three government entities.
Today the majority shareholder in Nuctech is Tongfang Co, which has a 71 percent stake. The largest shareholder in Tongfang, in turn, is the investment arm of the China National Nuclear Corp (CNNC), a state-run energy and defense conglomerate controlled by the Chinese State Council.
The US Department of Defense classifies CNNC as a Chinese military company, because it shares advanced technologies and expertise with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has further blurred the lines between China’s civilian and military activities and deepened the power of the CCP within private enterprises. One way in which he did this was the creation of dozens of government-backed financing vehicles designed to speed up the development of technologies that have military and commercial applications.
One of those vehicles, the National Military-Civil Fusion Industry Investment Fund, announced in June 2020 that it wanted to take a 4.4 percent stake in Nuctech’s majority shareholder, along with the right to appoint a director to the Tongfang board.
It never happened due to “changes in the market environment,” Tongfeng said in a Chinese stock exchange filing.
However, there are other links between Nuctech’s ownership structure and the fusion fund.
CNNC, which has a 21 percent interest in Nuctech, holds a stake of more than 7 percent in the fund, according to Qichacha, a Chinese corporate information platform.
They also share personnel: Chen Shutang (陳樹唐), a member of CNNC’s Party Leadership Group and the company’s chief accountant serves as a director of the fund, records showed.
Nuctech maintains that its operations are shaped by market forces, not politics, and has said that CNNC does not control its corporate management or decisionmaking.
However, Datenna chief executive officer Jaap van Etten, a former Dutch diplomat, said the question was “whether or not we want to allow Nuctech, which is controlled by the Chinese state and linked to the Chinese military, to be involved in crucial parts of our border security and infrastructure.”
Associated Press researcher Chen Si in Shanghai and reporters Menelaos Hadjicostis in Nicosia, Aritz Parra in Madrid, Nina Bigalke in London, Nicholas Paphitis in Athens, Justin Spike in Budapest, Liudas Dapkus in Vilnius, Zeynep Bilginsoy in Istanbul and Barry Hatton in Lisbon contributed to this report.
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, was “amazed” and “enthralled” by Chinese who rise at 3am for work. He praised it as a manifestation of talent and a good work ethic. Truthfully, that praise and statement about China, no matter its motivation, is nothing more than a round of applause for the atrocities inflicted by dictators and the spiritual anesthesia of their victims. “There’s just a lot of super-talented, hard-working people in China that strongly believe in manufacturing,” Musk said in an interview with the Financial Times on Tuesday. “And they won’t just be burning the midnight oil, they’ll be
“There’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it,” US President Joe Biden said after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine upended global geopolitics. Far from Earth, that transition is already happening. Just like in the era of Sputnik and Apollo more than half a century ago, world leaders are again racing to achieve dominance in outer space — but there is one big difference: Whereas the US and the Soviet Union hashed out a common set of rules at the UN, this time around the world’s top superpowers cannot even agree on basic principles to govern
With a Taiwan contingency increasingly more plausible, Taiwanese lobbies in Japan are calling for the government to pass a version of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), emulating the US precedent. Such a measure would surely enable Tokyo to make formal and regular contact with Taipei for dialogue, consultation, policy coordination and planning in military security. This would fill the missing link of the trilateral US-Japan-Taiwan security ties, rendering a US military defense of Taiwan more feasible through the support of the US-Japan alliance. Yet, particular caution should be exercised, as Beijing would probably view the move as a serious challenge to
As the Soviet Union was collapsing in the late 1980s and Russia seemed to be starting the process of democratization, 36-year-old US academic Francis Fukuyama had the audacity to assert that the world was at the “end of history.” Fukuyama claimed that democratic systems would become the norm, and peace would prevail the world over. He published a grandiose essay, “The End of History?” in the summer 1989 edition of the journal National Interest. Overnight, Fukuyama became a famous theorist in the US, western Europe, Japan and even Taiwan. Did the collapse of the Soviet Union mark the end of an era as