FTV News on Tuesday last week published an article with the headline “New milestone for gender equality” that described how Yuqing Temple in Miaoli City changed its rules to allow female volunteers to enter its inner sanctum, an area previously only accessible to men.
Women had been prevented from entering the area due to a taboo originating from the belief that the presence of menstruating women would offend the gods.
However, women were only allowed in as workers for the traditional cleaning ahead of the Lunar New Year, while more significant tasks, such as dressing statues, are still the exclusive realm of men.
This is the change being described as a groundbreaking, progressive move by the temple.
An elderly woman who has volunteered at the temple for many years said in the FTV News report that she “feels honored” to be allowed in and “there is now more of a gender balance.”
As an educator, I have two responses to this:
First, gender equality education is not only for young people. It should also include adults.
The seeds of gender equality awareness planted by teachers have grown and borne fruit in the past few years among students from elementary school to university level, but what happens when such a student returns home and sees their grandmother, who has long been dedicated to volunteering for a temple that has denied her access to its inner sanctum because of her sex, jubilant about finally being allowed to enter it — to clean.
At the same time, their grandfather gets to dress the statues, simply because he is a man.
This surely would confuse the student.
Is the temple’s “progressive move” real gender equality, or is it a tiny concession of a patriarchal system that allows it to say it is “progressive” while its unreasonable system persists?
It is reminiscent of the rhetoric of a group that opposed homosexual marriage saying — prior to the law changing — it “would not know how to teach children” if same-sex marriages were to be legalized.
Reports such as the FTV News one confirm just how important education is.
Sexism disguised as so-called “traditional customs and taboos,” and ideas such as “women who are menstruating offend the gods” should be re-examined.
My second response is I hope the Miaoli County Government or other authorities will step in.
The “progress” the temple’s management is touting is little more than an advance from being “very discriminatory” to “discriminatory.”
As a woman, it is sad to read about the “joy” of the female volunteers.
If I were a volunteer at a temple and had been treated differently because of my sex, I imagine that my experience would have been unpleasant and I would have left, never to return.
These women have been oppressed by a patriarchal system for many years. A temple that they devoted so many years of their life to treats them as inferior, and its “kind gesture” gives them joy.
God knows how many grievances and how much these women have been through.
Such news is by no means a “milestone for gender equality.” The power structure of male superiority over women stubbornly remains.
Gender equality education should not merely be a theory taught in school; it should be implemented in every aspect of life.
Chao Nan-hsing is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
The Ministry of the Interior, working with the navy and coast guard, is organizing Taiwan’s first joint exercise simulating escort tankers carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil through a Chinese blockade. The drills simulate fuel transport along three maritime corridors leading toward Japan, the Philippines and the US. Deputy Minister of the Interior Sawyer Mars (馬士元) said that a blockade of the Taiwan Strait would amount to “almost a 100 percent blockade of the regional energy supply.” Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo said planning to counter a blockade is standard practice in Taipei. While the exercise is limited in
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a