China has accelerated settlement-building along its disputed border with Bhutan, with more than 200 structures, including two-story buildings, under construction in six locations, an analysis of satellite images has shown.
The images and analysis, which were supplied by US data analytics firm HawkEye 360 and vetted by two other experts, provide a detailed look into China’s construction along its frontier with Bhutan.
Construction-related activity in some of the locations along Bhutan’s western border has been under way since early 2020, with China initially clearing out areas and building tracks, based on material provided by satellite imagery firms Capella Space and Planet Labs, said Chris Biggers, mission applications director at HawkEye 360, which uses satellites to gather intelligence on ground-level activities.
Illustration: Yusha
ACCELERATED BUILDUP
Images show that the work sped up last year.
Smaller structures were erected — possibly to house equipment and supplies — followed by the laying of foundations and then the construction of buildings, Biggers said.
“To me, 2021 was the period for acceleration,” Biggers said.
Two other experts who studied the locations of the new construction and satellite images taken by Capella Space said that all six settlements appear to be in territory disputed by China and Bhutan — including a contested tract of about 110km2 — with little in the way of resources or native population.
“It is Bhutan’s policy not to talk about boundary issues in public,” the Bhutanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a response to queries, declining to comment further.
The construction suggests that China is bent on resolving its border claims by giving its ambitions concrete form, the experts and one Indian defense source said.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the construction is “entirely for the improvement of the working and living conditions of the local people.”
“It is within China’s sovereignty to carry out normal construction activities on its own territory,” the ministry said, declining to comment further.
The villages offer Beijing some strategic value, two of the experts say.
The new construction is 9km to 27km from the Doklam area at the junction of the borders of India, Bhutan and China, where Indian and Chinese troops were locked in standoff for more than two months in 2017.
The settlements would allow China to better control and monitor far-flung areas, and potentially use them to establish security-focused installations, according to one expert and the Indian defense source.
The Indian Ministry of External Affairs did not respond to a request for comment.
Bhutan, a country with a population of less than 800,000 people, has been negotiating with Beijing for almost four decades to settle their 477km border. At issue for Bhutan is not just territorial integrity, but also concerns over the potential security implications for India, which is the Himalayan kingdom’s main ally and economic partner.
Bhutan and China had agreed during the latest round of boundary negotiations in April last year to speed up the process of resolving their differences, the Bhutanese foreign ministry said, declining to provide further details of a plan to do so.
“All issues are discussed between Bhutan and China within the framework of the Boundary Talks,” the ministry said.
“China’s village building across the claimed Bhutan border appears to be designed to force Bhutan to yield to Chinese demands in their border negotiations, now in their 24th round after 37 years,” said Robert Barnett, a professorial research associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London who is an expert on Tibet and has studied the China-Bhutan border closely.
BORDER VILLAGES
The settlements appear part of a plan Beijing made public in 2017 to build more than 600 villages in border areas in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR), which lies on the Chinese side of the disputed border, said Barnett and M. Taylor Fravel, director of the Security Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The construction indicated China likely wanted to consolidate its control and improve infrastructure in border areas, Fravel said.
The Chinese-controlled TAR was established in 1965, six years after the Dalai Lama fled Tibet in the wake of a failed uprising against Chinese rule.
Some of the villages near the border are built where there has been no previous construction.
The Chinese government gives residents subsidies to settle there, Barnett said.
“All the cross-border villages in the western Bhutan sector are sited in areas where no natural village would be found, since these areas are barely habitable,” he said.
CHICKEN’S NECK
Control over the remote Doklam plateau would potentially give China greater access to the adjoining “Chicken’s Neck” area, a strategic strip of land that connects India to its northeastern region.
India shares an unsettled 3,500km border with China. Troops from both countries remain deployed near each other in a separate border dispute in the Ladakh region — about 1,100km from Doklam — where they clashed in hand-to-hand combat in 2020.
India has been closely monitoring Chinese construction along its borders, the Indian defense source said, declining to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter.
The satellite imagery suggests that neither India nor Bhutan has responded on the ground to China’s construction activities, Biggers said.
Nathan Ruser, a researcher at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute research organization, added that it would be a challenge for India and Bhutan to counter the Chinese construction.
“Any action taken against these Chinese installations would necessarily put civilian populations at risk,” Ruser said. “It limits the ways in which India and Bhutan are able to combat Chinese encroachment into disputed territories.”
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS