Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space.
After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break.
Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s ability to participate in international organizations.
Resolution 2758 was intended to determine that “the People’s Republic of China, rather than the Chiang Kai-shek [蔣介石] regime, represents ‘China’ in the United Nations.”
However, the text of the resolution does not address “whether Taiwan is part of China” or “who governs the Taiwanese people.”
Nevertheless, China has weaponized Resolution 2758 through both legal and cognitive warfare to suppress Taiwan.
Legally, China continuously misleads the international community by asserting that Resolution 2758 determined Taiwan’s sovereignty — which it did not. This lends legitimacy to the Chinese Communist Party’s diplomatic pressures on Taiwan.
Cognitively, China conflates its “one China principle” with Resolution 2758, creating a false impression that the Taiwan issue has been resolved, diverting attention away from the fact that the resolution does not address Taiwan’s status.
The US recognizes China’s weaponization of Resolution 2758. As a result, Washington has been mobilizing the international community to reassess and reinterpret Resolution 2758, aiming to decouple Taiwan’s sovereign status from the resolution.
On the 50th anniversary of Resolution 2758 in 2021, then-US deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs Rick Waters publicly accused China of misusing the resolution to prevent Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international affairs.
Last year, the US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which says that Resolution 2758 does not pertain to Taiwan.
In March last year, US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink and US Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Ely Ratner told a congressional hearing that China had been using economic incentives and misinterpretations of Resolution 2758 to usurp Taiwan’s diplomatic allies.
Under the agenda set by the US, Taiwan should proactively devise strategies and ensure high-quality support from like-minded and allied countries during the World Health Assembly (WHA) to counteract China’s misleading narratives to the international community.
For example, during the 2022 WHA, the US supported Eswatini’s speech that rejected China’s long-standing misuse and hijacking of Resolution 2758, which said:
First, Resolution 2758 and WHA Resolution 25.1 only address the representation of China and do not authorize China to represent Taiwan, nor do they acknowledge Taiwan as part of China.
Second, the 2005 memorandum of understanding between China and the WHO grants Beijing an unreasonable veto power, allowing it to unilaterally decide Taiwan’s participation in the WHA or other WHO affairs.
Third, Taiwan’s participation in the WHA does not imply the WHO’s position on Taiwan’s sovereignty. Therefore, the WHO must invite Taiwan to the WHA to fulfill its vision of “health for all.”
Such arguments should be consistently and firmly promoted internationally to counteract China and its allies’ manipulation and misinterpretation of Resolution 2758.
Taiwan’s exclusion from the WHO signifies a failure by the international community to uphold its commitment to humanitarian principles and the promotion of health rights for all people, rather than a lack of capability of Taiwan to participate in global health affairs.
Taiwan should loudly voice its demands, leveraging the international support for Taiwan during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the short term, Taiwan should continue to mobilize supportive countries to clarify that Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty, and advocate for inclusion in critical WHO frameworks like the WHO pandemic agreement.
In the medium term, Taiwan should aim for the passage of resolutions at the WHA mandating the regular invitation of Taiwan to assemblies.
In the long term, Taiwan should work toward becoming a formal WHO member under its own name, thereby permanently resolving the issue of its participation.
Lin Shih-chia is executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS