Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space.
After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break.
Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s ability to participate in international organizations.
Resolution 2758 was intended to determine that “the People’s Republic of China, rather than the Chiang Kai-shek [蔣介石] regime, represents ‘China’ in the United Nations.”
However, the text of the resolution does not address “whether Taiwan is part of China” or “who governs the Taiwanese people.”
Nevertheless, China has weaponized Resolution 2758 through both legal and cognitive warfare to suppress Taiwan.
Legally, China continuously misleads the international community by asserting that Resolution 2758 determined Taiwan’s sovereignty — which it did not. This lends legitimacy to the Chinese Communist Party’s diplomatic pressures on Taiwan.
Cognitively, China conflates its “one China principle” with Resolution 2758, creating a false impression that the Taiwan issue has been resolved, diverting attention away from the fact that the resolution does not address Taiwan’s status.
The US recognizes China’s weaponization of Resolution 2758. As a result, Washington has been mobilizing the international community to reassess and reinterpret Resolution 2758, aiming to decouple Taiwan’s sovereign status from the resolution.
On the 50th anniversary of Resolution 2758 in 2021, then-US deputy assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs Rick Waters publicly accused China of misusing the resolution to prevent Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international affairs.
Last year, the US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which says that Resolution 2758 does not pertain to Taiwan.
In March last year, US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink and US Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs Ely Ratner told a congressional hearing that China had been using economic incentives and misinterpretations of Resolution 2758 to usurp Taiwan’s diplomatic allies.
Under the agenda set by the US, Taiwan should proactively devise strategies and ensure high-quality support from like-minded and allied countries during the World Health Assembly (WHA) to counteract China’s misleading narratives to the international community.
For example, during the 2022 WHA, the US supported Eswatini’s speech that rejected China’s long-standing misuse and hijacking of Resolution 2758, which said:
First, Resolution 2758 and WHA Resolution 25.1 only address the representation of China and do not authorize China to represent Taiwan, nor do they acknowledge Taiwan as part of China.
Second, the 2005 memorandum of understanding between China and the WHO grants Beijing an unreasonable veto power, allowing it to unilaterally decide Taiwan’s participation in the WHA or other WHO affairs.
Third, Taiwan’s participation in the WHA does not imply the WHO’s position on Taiwan’s sovereignty. Therefore, the WHO must invite Taiwan to the WHA to fulfill its vision of “health for all.”
Such arguments should be consistently and firmly promoted internationally to counteract China and its allies’ manipulation and misinterpretation of Resolution 2758.
Taiwan’s exclusion from the WHO signifies a failure by the international community to uphold its commitment to humanitarian principles and the promotion of health rights for all people, rather than a lack of capability of Taiwan to participate in global health affairs.
Taiwan should loudly voice its demands, leveraging the international support for Taiwan during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In the short term, Taiwan should continue to mobilize supportive countries to clarify that Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty, and advocate for inclusion in critical WHO frameworks like the WHO pandemic agreement.
In the medium term, Taiwan should aim for the passage of resolutions at the WHA mandating the regular invitation of Taiwan to assemblies.
In the long term, Taiwan should work toward becoming a formal WHO member under its own name, thereby permanently resolving the issue of its participation.
Lin Shih-chia is executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS