Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow.
The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.”
Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever to hit the country struck that very month, triggering a devastating tsunami and the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear meltdown, some hailed the author as a prophet.
Illustration: Mountain People
In 2021, she released an updated version that included a new prediction of disaster on “July 5, 2025,” involving a massive eruption in the Philippine Sea that triggers a tsunami striking Japan with waves three times the height of 2011.
Such a disaster would obviously be devastating on a human level. However, the comic has already had an economic impact, with some tourists from Hong Kong and elsewhere in Asia shunning trips out of fear. Takahide Kiuchi, executive economist at the Nomura Research Institute, estimates that ￥560 billion (US$3.9 billion) of economic damage could result if tourists continue to stay away due to this and other projections of doom.
As the date approaches, it is becoming more talked about domestically; I have been asked about it in bars and overheard its mention in coffee shops. A series of hundreds of relatively small quakes off the southern island of Kyushu over the past two weeks has kept disaster in the headlines. The manga has sold more than 1 million copies, while another book by Tatsuki is topping the charts.
Of course, despite advances in tectonic science, earthquakes cannot be predicted. The Japan Meteorological Agency has taken to social media to caution that “any such predictions should be considered unreliable.”
However, that message is muddled by the fact that the agency and the government believe that harbingers of the dreaded Nankai Trough megaquake can be detected. That resulted in a chilling official announcement last year about the elevated risk of a disaster that is estimated to kill as many as 300,000 people. That episode briefly had much of the country on edge. The next day, the country’s earthquake early warning alert was triggered, an automated signal that gives notice of an imminent big quake, piped straight to smartphones and trains. Sitting with colleagues in a bustling bar on a Friday evening, the chill that went through the room was palpable, as dozens of phones blared shrill messages of “Earthquake. Earthquake,” and we wondered if this was, indeed, the end.
Nothing happened. The alert was a false alarm. There is something to be said for keeping people on their toes: While mercifully the Nankai quake did not hit last year, the threat remains undiminished. The government’s alert prompted many to prepare or restock disaster supplies, with Japan’s rice shortage partly blamed on the spike in demand it caused, but caution quickly turns to complacency.
The idea that we can predict the future is an attractive one, promising certainty in an uncertain world. That helps overcome the litany of failed prophecies, from Nostradamus’ warnings in 1999 to the Maya doomsday theories in 2012. Some that do turn out to be true — think the 1988 Japanese animated movie Akira’s prediction that Tokyo would host the 2020 Olympics — are just examples of survivor bias. We forget those that do not come to pass, remembering only those that do, presumably including Tatsuki’s 2011 reference.
When it comes to Japan, past predictions of doom — such as a “hidden planet” Nibiru crashing into Earth, or a supermassive black hole at the galaxy’s center causing havoc — are not good comparisons. A catastrophe not dissimilar to the one Tatsuki describes really could take place at any time — tomorrow or any other day. Indeed, according to government estimates for the Nankai Trough quake, it is more likely than not to happen in our lifetimes.
Nonetheless, even in Japan many are still taken by surprise. Media focus on major disasters such as a quake hitting directly under Tokyo can lure those elsewhere into a false sense of security. Few, including the operators of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, were sufficiently prepared for a quake off the coast in 2011 — despite extensive records showing past disasters.
When nothing happens tomorrow, what then? Most would just shrug and move on, perhaps a little embarrassed for having believed it, or a little better prepared than they otherwise would have been. People might turn on Tatsuki, who has already distanced herself from the exact date. She might pop up again with another prediction — or fade back into obscurity.
Regardless, the message that we should prepare for disaster is one we should listen to. In all probability, the earthquake will not happen tomorrow, but it will happen sometime. That is a warning we should all heed.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
Cosmetics have long been one of the “golden pillars” of revenue for department stores in Taiwan. With rows of beauty counters and a full lineup of brands, they once served as a powerful draw for customers. However, since last year, the halo surrounding the sector has begun to fade. It is not an isolated issue affecting one retailer — it is a widespread phenomenon across department stores in Taiwan. Department store executives admit that business is tough, but they also stress that the root cause is not a drop in Taiwan’s spending power or a surge in outbound travel. Instead, a
RSS