Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow.
The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.”
Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever to hit the country struck that very month, triggering a devastating tsunami and the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear meltdown, some hailed the author as a prophet.
Illustration: Mountain People
In 2021, she released an updated version that included a new prediction of disaster on “July 5, 2025,” involving a massive eruption in the Philippine Sea that triggers a tsunami striking Japan with waves three times the height of 2011.
Such a disaster would obviously be devastating on a human level. However, the comic has already had an economic impact, with some tourists from Hong Kong and elsewhere in Asia shunning trips out of fear. Takahide Kiuchi, executive economist at the Nomura Research Institute, estimates that ￥560 billion (US$3.9 billion) of economic damage could result if tourists continue to stay away due to this and other projections of doom.
As the date approaches, it is becoming more talked about domestically; I have been asked about it in bars and overheard its mention in coffee shops. A series of hundreds of relatively small quakes off the southern island of Kyushu over the past two weeks has kept disaster in the headlines. The manga has sold more than 1 million copies, while another book by Tatsuki is topping the charts.
Of course, despite advances in tectonic science, earthquakes cannot be predicted. The Japan Meteorological Agency has taken to social media to caution that “any such predictions should be considered unreliable.”
However, that message is muddled by the fact that the agency and the government believe that harbingers of the dreaded Nankai Trough megaquake can be detected. That resulted in a chilling official announcement last year about the elevated risk of a disaster that is estimated to kill as many as 300,000 people. That episode briefly had much of the country on edge. The next day, the country’s earthquake early warning alert was triggered, an automated signal that gives notice of an imminent big quake, piped straight to smartphones and trains. Sitting with colleagues in a bustling bar on a Friday evening, the chill that went through the room was palpable, as dozens of phones blared shrill messages of “Earthquake. Earthquake,” and we wondered if this was, indeed, the end.
Nothing happened. The alert was a false alarm. There is something to be said for keeping people on their toes: While mercifully the Nankai quake did not hit last year, the threat remains undiminished. The government’s alert prompted many to prepare or restock disaster supplies, with Japan’s rice shortage partly blamed on the spike in demand it caused, but caution quickly turns to complacency.
The idea that we can predict the future is an attractive one, promising certainty in an uncertain world. That helps overcome the litany of failed prophecies, from Nostradamus’ warnings in 1999 to the Maya doomsday theories in 2012. Some that do turn out to be true — think the 1988 Japanese animated movie Akira’s prediction that Tokyo would host the 2020 Olympics — are just examples of survivor bias. We forget those that do not come to pass, remembering only those that do, presumably including Tatsuki’s 2011 reference.
When it comes to Japan, past predictions of doom — such as a “hidden planet” Nibiru crashing into Earth, or a supermassive black hole at the galaxy’s center causing havoc — are not good comparisons. A catastrophe not dissimilar to the one Tatsuki describes really could take place at any time — tomorrow or any other day. Indeed, according to government estimates for the Nankai Trough quake, it is more likely than not to happen in our lifetimes.
Nonetheless, even in Japan many are still taken by surprise. Media focus on major disasters such as a quake hitting directly under Tokyo can lure those elsewhere into a false sense of security. Few, including the operators of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, were sufficiently prepared for a quake off the coast in 2011 — despite extensive records showing past disasters.
When nothing happens tomorrow, what then? Most would just shrug and move on, perhaps a little embarrassed for having believed it, or a little better prepared than they otherwise would have been. People might turn on Tatsuki, who has already distanced herself from the exact date. She might pop up again with another prediction — or fade back into obscurity.
Regardless, the message that we should prepare for disaster is one we should listen to. In all probability, the earthquake will not happen tomorrow, but it will happen sometime. That is a warning we should all heed.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
RSS