My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting.
A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels, six were Chinese — including China Central Television, several regional Chinese stations and a channel from Hong Kong. Three were news stations.
It is shocking that a major hotel in Taiwan would so openly provide Chinese TV channels and news stations, and in such disproportionate numbers. Meanwhile, several well-known and credible international news stations were absent from the hotel’s offerings.
Taiwan claims to embrace globalization and has expressed aims to become a bilingual and international society, yet it is effectively isolating itself by locking its perspective into the framework of Chinese-produced television programs.
It is well-known that China does not have press freedom — its news stations are state-owned and operated, serving only to praise the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and lacking fair and objective reporting. In contrast, several news channels based in Taiwan take a clear, pro-China stance, often maliciously criticizing Taiwan’s government, while reporting on China with yearning and admiration.
Such Taiwanese media — which specialize in discrediting Taiwan’s democratic government and glorifying an authoritarian regime — in addition to Chinese news stations that aim to indoctrinate, have been made available for Taiwanese and foreign travelers’ enjoyment. That would undoubtedly deal a serious blow to Taiwan’s image of internationalization.
Taipei is a leading city, and as such, it should become a window into Taiwan for the international community. In addition to broadening the global perspective of Taiwanese, it should also serve as a benchmark city that allows foreign visitors to witness the level of the nation’s internationalization.
However, judging by the selection of TV channels available at hotels in Taipei, it seems that there is instead self-restriction. Airing an excessive number of Chinese TV channels diminishes Taiwan’s international standing.
Taiwan’s hotels seem all too willing and eager to broadcast Chinese state-run news, generously helping the CCP promote itself and embellish its international image. It appears that, for Taipei to truly achieve internationalization, it should start by diversifying the TV channels offered in its hotels.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS