My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting.
A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels, six were Chinese — including China Central Television, several regional Chinese stations and a channel from Hong Kong. Three were news stations.
It is shocking that a major hotel in Taiwan would so openly provide Chinese TV channels and news stations, and in such disproportionate numbers. Meanwhile, several well-known and credible international news stations were absent from the hotel’s offerings.
Taiwan claims to embrace globalization and has expressed aims to become a bilingual and international society, yet it is effectively isolating itself by locking its perspective into the framework of Chinese-produced television programs.
It is well-known that China does not have press freedom — its news stations are state-owned and operated, serving only to praise the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and lacking fair and objective reporting. In contrast, several news channels based in Taiwan take a clear, pro-China stance, often maliciously criticizing Taiwan’s government, while reporting on China with yearning and admiration.
Such Taiwanese media — which specialize in discrediting Taiwan’s democratic government and glorifying an authoritarian regime — in addition to Chinese news stations that aim to indoctrinate, have been made available for Taiwanese and foreign travelers’ enjoyment. That would undoubtedly deal a serious blow to Taiwan’s image of internationalization.
Taipei is a leading city, and as such, it should become a window into Taiwan for the international community. In addition to broadening the global perspective of Taiwanese, it should also serve as a benchmark city that allows foreign visitors to witness the level of the nation’s internationalization.
However, judging by the selection of TV channels available at hotels in Taipei, it seems that there is instead self-restriction. Airing an excessive number of Chinese TV channels diminishes Taiwan’s international standing.
Taiwan’s hotels seem all too willing and eager to broadcast Chinese state-run news, generously helping the CCP promote itself and embellish its international image. It appears that, for Taipei to truly achieve internationalization, it should start by diversifying the TV channels offered in its hotels.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS