The ministry of digital development is expected to open as early as the first quarter of this year, after the legislature on Dec. 28 approved the Cabinet’s plan to establish the new body.
This is good news. Developing a digital economy is an effective way for advanced countries to enhance their power, and it has become a major part of the nation’s strategy to promote industry.
The ministry, as a dedicated and specialist organization, is expected to play a pivotal role in coordinating the development of the digital economy and assisting all sectors in this transformation. The task is difficult, but crucial.
The question of where this new authority should be located must be considered carefully.
For an example of the thorny issue of location, look no further than the member list of the 16th Executive Yuan Human Rights Protection Task Force.
Appointed in August last year, 13 members of the group are from the private sector. Although these experts are leaders in their fields, in terms of geographical distribution, they are all based in Taipei or New Taipei City, with the southernmost affiliated institution, National Taipei University, in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District (三峽).
No human rights experts or academics based further south of the Taipei area were invited to join the task force. This Taipei-centric tunnel vision is disturbing.
During the COVID-19 pandemic era, companies across Taiwan and around the world have been waking up to the benefits of having employees working from home, and they are able to do this through digital technology.
This trend started many years ago, but the pandemic was a catalyst, and the phenomenon of remote working has become an irreversible trend.
It is therefore possible to recruit specialists living anywhere in the nation, not just in the north. As the primary promoter of digital national power development, those responsible for selecting the site of the ministry of digital development should be more forward thinking.
If those in power continue to only prioritize the nation’s capital, as seen with the human rights task force, and continue to establish new authorities or institutions in Taipei for the “convenience” of the government and top party officials based there, what can Taiwanese expect from the ministry of digital development?
Lo Cheng-chung is a professor and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS