Will the US Federal Reserve speed up its interest rate hikes this year? The Fed will have to consider US economic growth, the inflation outlook and the COVID-19 situation, but as the risk posed by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 appears controllable and employment data last month showed a still-tight labor market, a rate hike cycle might start as early as March, when the US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is to discuss measures to curb inflation. The Fed has maintained its target interest rate at zero to 0.25 percent since March 15, 2020.
The employment numbers released on Friday were a shot in the arm for the US economy and Fed Chairman Jerome Powell. The unemployment rate dropped to 3.9 percent from 4.2 percent in November, and average wages continued to rise, up 0.6 percent from the previous month.
Meanwhile, nonfarm payroll employment increased by 199,000 last month on a seasonally adjusted basis, following upward revisions in the previous two months, the US Department of Labor reported. While public health concerns remain, the employment data continued to boost the economy, and, based on data compiled by Reuters and Bloomberg, the probability that the FOMC will lift the interest rate in March is above 70 percent.
The committee said last month that it would wind down the Fed’s bond-buying program faster than first announced at its November meeting, aiming to end the program in March. However, the minutes of its meeting last month, which were released on Wednesday, revealed not only FOMC policymakers’ thoughts of a faster timeline to raise the rate and scale back asset purchases, but also that they discussed reducing the Fed’s balance sheet, which has ballooned to US$8.8 trillion following years of purchases of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities.
The minutes showed the Fed’s hawkish position on monetary policy, but at the same time confused the public with regard to its intentions. On the one hand, a quick interest rate increase would mean that the Fed has confidence in the US economy and that inflation can be brought under control. Rate hikes would increase people’s income from savings, boost consumption and further stimulate the economy.
On the other hand, the markets were upset by the FOMC’s discussions about reducing the balance sheet, with investors on Thursday worrying that the central bank’s moves might reduce global market liquidity.
The Fed’s policies have over the past two years pumped liquidity into global markets, helping them weather the COVID-19 pandemic. Losing this boost is a legitimate worry for investors, who can only speculate how and when the Fed might start working toward shrinking its balance sheet.
The anticipated rate hike and balance sheet reduction would lead to rising US Treasury yields and a stronger US dollar, which could in turn lead to greater volatility and affect fund flows into emerging markets, and their currencies and equities, including Taiwan’s.
Fortunately, Taiwan has a strategic advantage — its semiconductor industry — and its external debt burden is light, so Taiwan’s economy would not be hit hard by the Fed’s policy changes, although the stock market in Taipei might experience a mild pullback due to capital outflows.
As several central banks — including in South Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, the UK and Russia — have tightened their monetary policy, it is only a matter of time until the central bank in Taipei raises its rates. This move would warrant investors’ closer attention to leverage in financial markets and investment plans, as well as measures for vulnerable groups and pandemic-hit businesses.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is