National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) is at it again.
Last year, the university was at the center of a controversy after establishing the Taipei School of Economics and Political Science, funded by PJ Asset Management Group.
The on-campus academy was described by some as an “illegal rooftop addition” to Taiwan’s higher education.
This time, there have been reports that a Chinese Communist Party-linked entity, the Cross-Strait Tsinghua Research Institute (清華海峽研究院), had been operating at the university since 2016.
What efforts has the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) made on the issue?
MAC Minister Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) told a question-and-answer session at the Legislative Yuan that the council in July received reports on the issue and informed the Ministry of Education in August.
The problem is that had the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) not uncovered the case earlier this month, the institute might still be open today.
Surprisingly, it took nearly four months for the government to shut the institute. Did the council not see it as a matter of concern?
Chiu also said that, based on “respect for academia,” the council “rarely” investigates whether educational institutions have been infiltrated by Beijing, so the institutions might become loopholes.
His statement was also full of holes.
Rarely? The council has probably never investigated whether there are any infiltrated institutions. Without investigation, how did Chiu come to the conclusion that such campuses might become loopholes?
Clearly, the council was covering up its own incompetence and failure, and used “respect for academia” as an excuse.
Has the council not noticed that the world’s democratic countries are busy eliminating Chinese academies in jurisdictions that have infiltrated their universities?
As the US tries to kick out Chinese-run Confucius Institutes, Taiwan has established one center for Mandarin learning after another in the US.
The world has sensed the seriousness of Chinese infiltration at universities, while Taiwan is still upholding the banner of “respect for academia.” Although the fire of communism has already broken out on campuses, the “firefighters” are still hesitant to go in and extinguish the flames.
As for NTHU, by helping the institute establish itself on campus without asking for the education ministry’s approval, the school might have contravened the University Act (大學法) and the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), and university officials could face a fine or imprisonment.
However, the university is passing the buck and claims that the institute was formed by its alumni association, and its office was rented from the Tze-Chiang Foundation of Science and Technology. That is certainly a big lie.
An investigation by the National Security Bureau found that the office on the fifth floor of NTHU’s Innovative Incubation Center was rented to the foundation by the university, which then rented it to the Cross-Strait Tsinghua Research Institute on its own accord.
Although the foundation was responsible for renting it to the institute, the university might have been behind the decision to do so.
The government should therefore at least show determination and expel the foundation from NTHU’s campus.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
Since leaving office last year, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has been journeying across continents. Her ability to connect with international audiences and foster goodwill toward her country continues to enhance understanding of Taiwan. It is possible because she can now walk through doors in Europe that are closed to President William Lai (賴清德). Tsai last week gave a speech at the Berlin Freedom Conference, where, standing in front of civil society leaders, human rights advocates and political and business figures, she highlighted Taiwan’s indispensable global role and shared its experience as a model for democratic resilience against cognitive warfare and
The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric. On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus. On Friday, in what
RSS