As Beijing seeks to tighten its grip on Hong Kong, it has a new mandate for the territory’s powerful property tycoons: pour resources and influence into backing Beijing’s interests, and help solve a potentially destabilizing housing shortage.
Chinese officials delivered the message in closed meetings this year amid broader efforts to bring the territory to heel under a National Security Law and make it more “patriotic,” three major developers and a Hong Kong government adviser familiar with the talks said.
“The rules of the game have changed,” they were told, said a source close to Chinese officials, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter.
Beijing is no longer willing to tolerate “monopoly behavior,” the source added.
For Hong Kong’s biggest property firms, that would be a big shift. The companies have long exerted outsized power under the territory’s hybrid political system, helping to choose its leaders, shaping government policies and reaping the benefits of a land auction system that kept supply tight and property prices among the world’s highest.
The sprawling businesses of the four major developers — CK Asset Holdings, Henderson Land Development, Sun Hung Kai Properties and New World Development — extend their influence even farther into society. For example, the empire of Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing (李嘉誠) of CK Asset Holdings, includes property, supermarkets, pharmacies and utilities.
Because the tycoons are so deeply intertwined with the territory’s economy and politics, it would be difficult for Beijing to sideline them completely, said Leung Chun-ying (梁振英), former Hong Kong chief executive and now a vice-chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC).
“They are a major component of our political and economic ecosystem, so we need to be careful,” Leung said. “I think we need to be judicious with what we do and not throw the baby out with the bathwater.”
Some Chinese officials and state media have blamed tycoons for failing to prevent anti-government protests in 2019, which they say stemmed from sky-high property prices.
The protests, joined by millions of all ages and social strata, demanded greater democracy and less meddling by Beijing in Hong Kong, which had been promised wide-ranging freedoms until 2047.
The new directives mark an inflection point in the power play between Beijing and the tycoons, who were once the kingmakers in Hong Kong’s political leadership race.
“Now the focus is on contribution to the country; this is not what the traditional business sector in Hong Kong is used to,” said Raymond Tsoi (蔡志忠), chairman of Asia Property Holdings (HK) and a member of the CPPCC Shanxi Provincial Committee.
In March, Beijing made sweeping electoral changes. In a new Hong Kong Election Committee, responsible for choosing the next leader of Hong Kong and some of its lawmakers, a greater “patriotic” force has emerged, while many of the prominent tycoons, including Li, 93, are to be absent for the first time since Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule in 1997.
Hong Kong’s Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau said the Election Committee would be more broadly representative of Hong Kong, going beyond the vested interests of specific sectors, specific districts and specific groups, which it called “inadequacies” in the system.
The source close to Chinese government officials said that a team in the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office (HKMAO) had sought to curtail the influence of groups perceived to have done little for Beijing’s interests in the territory.
The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office and the Hong Kong Liaison Office did not respond to requests for comment.
Sun Hung Kai said it was confident about the future of Hong Kong and would continue to invest there and in cities in China. Henderson Land and New World Development declined to comment, while CK Asset Holdings did not respond to request for comment. Li did not respond to a request for comment.
Developers have taken steps to show that Beijing’s message was received.
New World and Henderson Land have donated rural land as reserves for social housing. In the past few weeks, Nan Fung Group, Sun Hung Kai, Henderson Land and Wheelock applied for a public-private partnership scheme, the first applications since the program was launched in May last year.
The program offers developers an opportunity to build on a higher percentage of open land, but they must use at least 70 percent of the extra floor area for public housing.
Last year, several sources said that the program was unattractive because there were many restrictions and a risk of higher costs.
“Beijing is not telling us what to do, but saying you need to solve this problem,” Gordon Wu (胡應湘) of Hopewell Holdings said. “It won’t be impatient, but it will give you pressure,” Wu added.
Another developer source, who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue, said that Chinese officials had laid out expectations, but no strategy or deadline.
“We can continue our businesses as long as we give back more to society,” said the source, a senior official at a top developer in Hong Kong.
The sector needs to step up efforts to ease the housing shortage, he added.
Most of the developers have published statements and newspaper advertisements, along with other Chinese corporations, to support the national security legislation and electoral changes.
Critics of the moves have said that they crush democratic dreams, while the authorities have said that they are necessary to restore stability after the 2019 demonstrations.
Adrian Cheng (鄭志剛), 41, who took over as chief executive of New World, founded by his grandfather, late last year said that the company needs to become more relevant to society, especially in a new environment in which firms must carefully balance the interests of various parties.
“It’s not easy. I have a lot of gray hair you can’t see,” Cheng said.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS