The Bureau of Energy’s announcement on Monday that the nation is expected to finish the year 40 percent behind schedule regarding offshore wind farm targets might appear inconsequential, especially as other issues are weighing heavily on people’s minds.
However, the delay speaks of the colossal challenges that the nation is facing in its quest for an effective and timely transition away from reliance on fossil fuels and nuclear energy to a zero-carbon future.
Nuclear power is certainly to be phased out, even in case of an upset in a referendum later this year on restarting construction of the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). The other three plants are due to be decommissioned as their operating permits expire in the coming years. Even in the unlikely event that the fourth plant was approved to go online, it would be years before construction was completed.
The government is right to set the ambitious target of zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and to exclude nuclear power from the energy mix.
However, relying on sustainable energy is a risky proposition, and the government might have bitten off more than it can chew.
The delay in meeting the offshore wind farm targets merely hints at the problem. Power outages in May and a water shortage earlier this year are also linked to the huge balancing act that the government is performing.
Per capita, Taiwan is among the largest producers of greenhouse gases in the world. As a resource-poor nation, Taiwan is also extremely vulnerable to shifting weather patterns and extreme weather events, as well as increases in ocean levels, temperatures and acidity. Whether to prioritize industry or agriculture amid the water shortage was a mere taste of the difficult decisions that the government will need to make as droughts become more frequent and severe.
Central to this is the industrial “jewel of the nation,” Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The chipmaker is a major driver of Taiwan’s economy, and since the vulnerability of global supply chains was laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic, it has increasingly taken on a geopolitical and strategic importance.
TSMC is not only a global leader in its field, it also has the experience, resources and intention to stay in the lead, as it plans to spend US$100 billion over the next three years to increase production capacity, with ever tinier and more sophisticated semiconductors in the pipeline, expecting to produce cutting-edge 3-nanometer chips in volume next year.
While this is great news for TSMC and its competitiveness — as well as for Taiwan, its economy and national security — chip production is notoriously energy and water intensive. The more sophisticated the chip is, the more demanding the production process.
It is good news for the environment that chip production is not as polluting as heavy industries, and the derived applications will enable cleaner technologies to be used, but electricity and water will need to come from somewhere.
If they are diverted from agriculture or households, social tension will mount. The still-immature renewable energy sector will not be able to provide the required power.
TSMC has pledged to use 100 percent renewable energy by 2050, and last year, it signed a contract to purchase energy generated by offshore wind farms to be built in the Taiwan Strait.
Still, the government will need to perform a complex balancing act if it hopes to honor its commitments to industry, agriculture, the public and the environment.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS