A surge in local COVID-19 infections over the past week has dented the government’s much-lauded success in containing the virus and revealed a critical flaw in Taiwan’s fight against the disease: an inadequate vaccine rollout.
The lack of a domestically produced vaccine, difficulty obtaining foreign jabs due to governments prioritizing their own citizens, vaccine hoarding by some countries and suspected meddling by Beijing to obstruct vaccine sales to Taiwan have stymied Taipei’s efforts to secure a sufficient amount of COVID-19 vaccine doses.
Meanwhile, the reluctance of Taiwanese to get the relatively few available AstraZeneca jabs doused the government’s attempts to kick-start a vaccination program.
However, with the surge in local cases, Taiwanese now have a renewed sense of urgency to get vaccinated, and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has spied an opportunity in Taiwan’s misfortune.
The CCP has offered its Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine to Taiwan, but the government has turned it down, not only due to questions over the vaccine’s effectiveness, but also due to concerns over the CCP’s “vaccine diplomacy” and “united front” motivations.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokeswoman Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) on Monday sought to exploit the outbreak for CCP propaganda purposes, saying that “Taiwan compatriots” — whom she called “our flesh and blood relatives” — are eager to use vaccines from China and that “it is imperative to remove Taiwan’s artificial political barriers.”
With Zhu pretending that Beijing is acting from a purely humanitarian position devoid of political motives, China’s propaganda machine has rammed home the CCP’s message for international consumption.
The English-language edition of the Global Times said: “Despite the DPP [Democratic Progressive Party] authorities’ discrimination propaganda and extremely hostile policies against [China], [Beijing] this time also showed its kindness based on humanitarian principles and the family-style affection [by offering the Sinopharm vaccine].”
The China Unification Promotion Party last week called on the government to accept the vaccine, which it said China has offered out of “goodwill” and for the sake of “maintaining Taiwanese’s health and well-being.” Otherwise, the DPP would be “responsible for deaths and health problems among Taiwanese, and cause the outbreak to deteriorate,” it said.
Beijing desires the DPP’s compliance because it wants to show the world how it is helping a “much-loved,” if “wayward,” “local” government.
Fostering the impression that Beijing, with its authoritarian governance and greater resources, is more capable than the Taiwanese government in containing the virus would be a public relations coup for the CCP.
Mainland Affairs Council spokesman Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) responded to Zhu’s comments by saying that China should not express its “fake concern,” and that Taiwan can obtain more reliable vaccines from the international community as long as China does not obstruct its efforts.
A new batch of more than 400,000 AstraZeneca shots arrived in Taiwan yesterday, and the government is exploring various avenues to secure greater amounts of more effective vaccines from trusted sources — and which come with no strings attached.
However, these, as well as domestically produced vaccines — which President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has said would be ready by late July — would take time to deploy, whereas the CCP’s offer is already on the table.
Despite what Zhu would have Taiwanese believe, this is a propaganda war, and the CCP is ready to turn up the heat if Taiwan’s outbreak worsens.
The government must fight back and explain to the public why it turned down the CCP’s poisoned offers.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS