For decades, global leaders have failed to respond to climate change with appropriate urgency, even though the science has long been clear.
Now, the problem has become so acute that it is impossible to ignore, and those in positions of power are under growing pressure to start making up for lost time.
For businesses, the pressure is no longer coming only from protesters, but also from shareholders, customers, investors, lenders, employees, policymakers and every other stakeholder with a true understanding of the climate threat.
From supply-chain disruptions to lethal conditions for outdoor workers, the risks to business are multiplying.
From now on, CEOs will need to answer four key questions: What would my market look like in a net-zero-emissions world? What is my business model for succeeding in that market? What changes should I make now to prepare for success? What supporting conditions will I need, and how do I go about securing them?
CEOs who act early can secure competitive advantages and capture major economic opportunities for their companies. The global shift toward a net-zero global economy is already underway, auguring a complete transformation of almost every sector, with some players reaping major rewards while others commit to major write-downs.
Consider the stock performance of power companies that have committed to the clean energy transition:
Danish multinational Orsted has gone from supplying 85 percent of its power with fossil fuels in 2009 to supplying 88 percent with renewable resources today. It expects to reach net-zero energy generation and operations by 2025, and to eliminate all emissions associated with its business by 2040.
During this transformation, the company has started to post consistent profits, and its stock valuation has soared.
“Shares in the company have more than doubled since its listing in 2016, giving Orsted a valuation of US$56 billion,” E&E News reported. “That is more than ConocoPhillips and all but a handful of American utilities.”
As the energy transition continues to accelerate, climate commitments will increasingly be seen as table stakes for doing business. Climate champions will surge ahead of the laggards, and this first-mover advantage will cascade across the economy, starting in the sectors with a relatively straightforward path to decarbonization: electricity, transportation and buildings.
Progress here will then enable similar transformations in industries that are harder to decarbonize, such as shipping, steel, cement and aviation.
In fact, climate leaders are already emerging even in these more challenging sectors.
In shipping, Danish giant Maersk has committed to deploying a carbon-neutral vessel by 2023.
“Fast-tracked by advances in technology and increasing customer demand for sustainable supply chains, [Maersk] is accelerating efforts to decarbonize marine operations,” it said.
Similarly, in aviation, Airbus is leading the way with plans to deploy a carbon-neutral hydrogen-powered aircraft by 2035.
Airbus chief executive officer Guillaume Faury said this is “a historic moment for the commercial aviation sector [and] the most important transition this industry has ever seen.”
Such decarbonization ambitions in hard-to-abate sectors should be a signal to CEOs everywhere that the net-zero transition is already here.
As Ernest Hemingway famously said about personal bankruptcy, it often happens “gradually, then suddenly.”
The shift to a green economy will be no different.
Increasingly, business leaders are recognizing that the risks of being left behind will grow larger by the day.
The imperative to achieve net-zero emissions is not merely about positioning one’s company for survival; it will also be good for business.
Chief executives can start implementing initiatives that will actually save money, by reducing waste, increasing circularity and improving energy efficiency.
Moreover, adopting sustainable systems and operations will yield significant benefits to a company’s brand, attracting not just customers, but also top talent.
Investors, board members, policymakers and other key stakeholders are increasingly interested in companies with a sustainable plan for the future.
As leaders with an important role to play in global decision-making, CEOs have an enormous responsibility to help drive progress toward net-zero emissions.
We are in the race of our lives, and so are companies. Any attempt to win by moving slowly will amount to a defeat for everyone. While we all must take action, it is incumbent on those with the most power to leverage their positions in the interest of rapid change.
We still have a chance to avoid truly catastrophic climate-change scenarios, but only if every leader steps up. The risks posed by climate change are an existential threat that no one — and no company — can avoid.
Michel Fredeau is managing director and senior partner at Boston Consulting Group and a member of the World Economic Forum Global Future Council on Net-Zero Transition. Jules Kortenhorst is chief executive officer of RMI.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS