For decades, global leaders have failed to respond to climate change with appropriate urgency, even though the science has long been clear.
Now, the problem has become so acute that it is impossible to ignore, and those in positions of power are under growing pressure to start making up for lost time.
For businesses, the pressure is no longer coming only from protesters, but also from shareholders, customers, investors, lenders, employees, policymakers and every other stakeholder with a true understanding of the climate threat.
From supply-chain disruptions to lethal conditions for outdoor workers, the risks to business are multiplying.
From now on, CEOs will need to answer four key questions: What would my market look like in a net-zero-emissions world? What is my business model for succeeding in that market? What changes should I make now to prepare for success? What supporting conditions will I need, and how do I go about securing them?
CEOs who act early can secure competitive advantages and capture major economic opportunities for their companies. The global shift toward a net-zero global economy is already underway, auguring a complete transformation of almost every sector, with some players reaping major rewards while others commit to major write-downs.
Consider the stock performance of power companies that have committed to the clean energy transition:
Danish multinational Orsted has gone from supplying 85 percent of its power with fossil fuels in 2009 to supplying 88 percent with renewable resources today. It expects to reach net-zero energy generation and operations by 2025, and to eliminate all emissions associated with its business by 2040.
During this transformation, the company has started to post consistent profits, and its stock valuation has soared.
“Shares in the company have more than doubled since its listing in 2016, giving Orsted a valuation of US$56 billion,” E&E News reported. “That is more than ConocoPhillips and all but a handful of American utilities.”
As the energy transition continues to accelerate, climate commitments will increasingly be seen as table stakes for doing business. Climate champions will surge ahead of the laggards, and this first-mover advantage will cascade across the economy, starting in the sectors with a relatively straightforward path to decarbonization: electricity, transportation and buildings.
Progress here will then enable similar transformations in industries that are harder to decarbonize, such as shipping, steel, cement and aviation.
In fact, climate leaders are already emerging even in these more challenging sectors.
In shipping, Danish giant Maersk has committed to deploying a carbon-neutral vessel by 2023.
“Fast-tracked by advances in technology and increasing customer demand for sustainable supply chains, [Maersk] is accelerating efforts to decarbonize marine operations,” it said.
Similarly, in aviation, Airbus is leading the way with plans to deploy a carbon-neutral hydrogen-powered aircraft by 2035.
Airbus chief executive officer Guillaume Faury said this is “a historic moment for the commercial aviation sector [and] the most important transition this industry has ever seen.”
Such decarbonization ambitions in hard-to-abate sectors should be a signal to CEOs everywhere that the net-zero transition is already here.
As Ernest Hemingway famously said about personal bankruptcy, it often happens “gradually, then suddenly.”
The shift to a green economy will be no different.
Increasingly, business leaders are recognizing that the risks of being left behind will grow larger by the day.
The imperative to achieve net-zero emissions is not merely about positioning one’s company for survival; it will also be good for business.
Chief executives can start implementing initiatives that will actually save money, by reducing waste, increasing circularity and improving energy efficiency.
Moreover, adopting sustainable systems and operations will yield significant benefits to a company’s brand, attracting not just customers, but also top talent.
Investors, board members, policymakers and other key stakeholders are increasingly interested in companies with a sustainable plan for the future.
As leaders with an important role to play in global decision-making, CEOs have an enormous responsibility to help drive progress toward net-zero emissions.
We are in the race of our lives, and so are companies. Any attempt to win by moving slowly will amount to a defeat for everyone. While we all must take action, it is incumbent on those with the most power to leverage their positions in the interest of rapid change.
We still have a chance to avoid truly catastrophic climate-change scenarios, but only if every leader steps up. The risks posed by climate change are an existential threat that no one — and no company — can avoid.
Michel Fredeau is managing director and senior partner at Boston Consulting Group and a member of the World Economic Forum Global Future Council on Net-Zero Transition. Jules Kortenhorst is chief executive officer of RMI.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
The topic of increased intergenerational conflict has been making headlines in the past few months, showcasing a problem that would only grow as Taiwan approaches “super-aged society” status. A striking example of that tension erupted on the Taipei MRT late last month, when an apparently able-bodied passenger kicked a 73-year-old woman across the width of the carriage. The septuagenarian had berated and hit the young commuter with her bag for sitting in a priority seat, despite regular seats being available. A video of the incident went viral online. Altercations over the yielding of MRT seats are not common, but they are
RSS