As Stop Asian Hate rallies swept across the US and Canada on Sunday, a small march to support the cause also took place in Taipei, but went largely unnoticed. The events were organized in response to a mass shooting at spas in Atlanta, Georgia, but they stress that anti-Asian racism around the globe has been surging since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Perhaps a rally against white supremacy and racism against Asians did not seem relevant in Taiwan, but nevertheless it is an important issue that Taiwanese should be paying attention to, especially when they stand in solidarity with other oppressed groups.
Anti-Asian racism in the US and other nations is nothing new, but this surge in violence — with the number of incidents jumping 150 percent last year — has its origins in former US president Donald Trump’s vitriolic political rhetoric against China and his administration’s labeling of COVID-19 as the “Chinese virus.”
Many Taiwanese share Trump’s disdain for the Chinese Communist Party due to Beijing’s constant bullying and threatening behavior, even staging several marches in support of Trump after he lost his bid for re-election in November last year. An estimated 8,000 people showed up for a rally the following month and another 300 took to the streets in January.
However, Trump’s anti-Chinese rhetoric — and his generally divisive and inflammatory behavior while he was in office — has led to a tragic situation that affects not only Chinese, but all Asians in the US, including Taiwanese and Taiwanese-Americans.
Meanwhile, only a fraction of the number who marched in the pro-Trump events took part in the anti-Asian racism rally on Sunday, and many of them were Taiwanese-Americans or foreign residents.
While the US is an important ally as Taiwan resists Chinese aggression and people are free to voice their support for Trump, Taiwanese should look at the whole picture and not turn a blind eye to the fruits of his administration — especially when their overseas compatriots and loved ones might be affected.
Despite Taiwan’s human rights achievements, it is by no means free of racism. Much of it is leveled against Southeast Asian migrant workers, as well as Aborigines. These incidents, ranging from blatant abuse to inappropriate comments, are widely reported, but often sensationalized.
Moreover, when the furor dies down, the misbehavior continues.
Black people are also affected here, with several egregious incidents in the past year, including companies refusing to hire them, as well as performers donning blackface.
However, in Taiwan, racist behavior does not usually manifest as violence, although that makes it easier to pretend that it does not exist or is unrelated to what happens in the US.
Nonetheless, racism is racism, regardless of the form it takes and the offender’s intent, which is why paying attention to the events in the US is crucial. Perhaps that would cause people in Taiwan to reflect on their behavior and be more sympathetic for their own people living in fear and being abused in another country.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS