The US expects to “celebrate independence” from COVID-19 by Independence Day on July 4, when vaccines would have been made available to all adults. However, for many developing countries and emerging markets, the end of the crisis is a long way off.
As we show in a report for the Institute for New Economic Thinking’s (INET) Commission on Global Economic Transformation, achieving a rapid global recovery requires that all countries be able to declare independence from the virus.
Because the coronavirus mutates, it would put everyone at risk as long as it continues to flourish anywhere in the world. It is thus critical that vaccines, personal protective equipment and therapeutics be distributed everywhere as quickly as possible. Insofar as today’s supply constraints are the result of a poorly designed international intellectual property (IP) regime, they are essentially artificial.
While IP reform in general is long overdue, what is needed most urgently now is suspension or pooling of the IP rights attached to products needed to fight COVID-19. Many nations are pleading for this, but corporate lobbies in advanced economies have resisted, and their governments have succumbed to myopia.
The rise of “pandemic nationalism” has exposed a number of deficiencies in the global trade, investment and IP regimes (which the INET commission plans to address in a later report).
Advanced economies, especially the US, have acted forcefully to reignite their economies, and support vulnerable businesses and households. They have learned, even if only briefly, that austerity is deeply counterproductive in such crises.
However, most developing countries are struggling to obtain the funds to maintain existing support programs, let alone absorb the additional costs imposed by the pandemic. While the US has spent 25 percent of GDP to support its economy — thereby greatly containing the magnitude of the downturn — developing countries have been able to spend only a small fraction of that.
Our calculations, based on World Bank data, show that at nearly US$17,000 per capita, US spending has been 8,000 times higher than that of the least-developed countries.
Beyond unleashing their fiscal firepower, developed countries would help themselves and the global recovery by pursuing three policies.
First, they should push for a large issuance of special drawing rights (SDR), the IMF’s global reserve asset. As matters stand, the IMF could immediately issue about US$650 billion in SDRs without seeking approval from member-state legislatures. Moreover, the expansionary effect could be boosted significantly if rich countries were to transfer their disproportionately larger allocations to countries in need of cash.
The second set of actions also involves the IMF, owing to its large role in shaping macroeconomic policies in the developing world, particularly in countries that have turned to it for help with balance-of-payments problems.
In an encouraging sign, the IMF has actively supported the pursuit of massive, prolonged fiscal packages by the US and the EU, and has even recognized the need for enhanced public spending in developing countries, despite the adverse external conditions.
However, when it comes to setting the terms for loans to countries facing balance-of-payments stress, the IMF’s actions are not always consistent with its statements.
An Oxfam International analysis of recent and ongoing standby agreements finds that from March to September last year, 76 of the 91 IMF loans negotiated with 81 countries required public-expenditure cuts that could undermine healthcare systems and pension schemes, freeze wages for public-sector workers (including doctors, nurses and teachers), and reduce unemployment insurance, sick pay and other social benefits.
Austerity — especially cutbacks in these vital areas — would not work any better for developing nations than it would for developed ones. Additionally, more assistance, including the aforementioned SDR proposals, would give these countries more fiscal space.
Lastly, developed countries could orchestrate a comprehensive response to the overwhelming debt problems many countries are facing. Money spent servicing debt is money that is not helping countries fight the virus and restart their economies.
In the early stages of the pandemic, it was hoped that a suspension of debt servicing for developing countries and emerging markets would suffice. However, it has now been more than a year and some countries need comprehensive debt restructuring, rather than the usual Band-Aids that merely set the stage for another crisis in a few years.
There are a number of ways that creditor governments can facilitate such restructurings and induce more active participation from the private sector, which so far has been relatively recalcitrant. As the INET commission’s report shows, if there were ever a time to recognize the principles of force majeure and necessity, this is it. Countries should not be forced to pay back what they cannot afford, especially when doing so would cause so much suffering.
The policies described here would be of enormous benefit to the developing world and would come at little or no cost to developed countries. Indeed, it is in these countries’ enlightened self-interest to do what they can for people in developing countries and emerging markets, especially when what they can do is readily available and would bring enormous benefits to billions.
Political leaders in the developed world must recognize that no one is safe until everyone is safe, and that a healthy global economy is not possible without a strong recovery everywhere.
Michael Spence, a Nobel laureate in economics, is emeritus professor at Stanford University and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, is university professor at Columbia University and a member of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation. Jayati Ghosh, executive secretary of International Development Economics Associates, is professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and a member of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation.
This commentary is also signed by Rob Johnson, Rohinton Medhora, Dani Rodrik and other members of the Commission on Global Economic Transformation at the Institute for New Economic Thinking.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic