Chinese tech companies did a pretty good job of convincing global investors that they operated independently from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but Jack Ma (馬雲) has become a case study for the firms’ biggest skeptics.
Companies from Alibaba Group Holding to Tencent Holdings splashed out billions on overseas acquisitions, while developing apps and technologies that challenged Western rivals, with little or no state interference.
However, Beijing’s pursuit of Ma and his Ant Group after he criticized regulators arguably plays directly into the hands of China’s biggest critics in Washington, who have long asserted that no Chinese tech giant or entrepreneur is beyond the reach of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Illustration: Louise Ting
US authorities are debating whether to ban investments in Alibaba and Tencent, according to people familiar with the matter, in what would be a dramatic blow to two of the companies whose shares are most widely held by global investors.
Already on Tuesday last week, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning transactions with eight Chinese software applications, including Ant’s Alipay and Tencent’s WeChat Pay, citing concerns that Beijing would have access to the data collected by the platforms.
“I stand with President Trump’s commitment to protecting the privacy and security of Americans from threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party,” US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross said in a statement on the order.
Beijing’s moves could raise pressure on the incoming administration of US president-elect Joe Biden to push through further action detrimental to China, although it is not clear how much of Trump’s aggressive policies Biden would continue.
The CCP’s sway over business has become even clearer over the past 12 months, as Xi pushes to consolidate power ahead of next year’s Chinese National People’s Congress, when he is expected to extend his rule for at least another five years.
The COVID-19 pandemic has only served to strengthen his grip, fueling a war-like campaign to steer the economy back on track and snuff out perceived threats to national security.
“You need to be very mindful of who ultimately controls regulations, who controls licensing — of who’s in charge,” Beijing-based Marbridge Consulting managing director Mark Natkin said. “And if you forget and you start to be overly critical, or take too much of a role that normally belongs to the party, then you’re going to get chopped down a notch or two.”
Beijing has moved to fundamentally overhaul Ma’s trillion-dollar Internet empire since demolishing Ant’s US$35 billion initial public offering (IPO) in November last year, a record-breaking debut that was to have been the entrepreneur’s crowning achievement.
Authorities then forced his online finance titan to cap loans and devise a plan to hive off its most lucrative businesses. The government also launched a probe into alleged anti-competitive practices at Alibaba.
Ma has not been seen in public since November last year and his absence from the recent taping of an African TV program that he created spurred speculation of his whereabouts.
“There is a lot of power in the Chinese government’s economic and financial management infrastructure, and if Ant was going to erode that power, important people would see it as a step too far,” said Graham Webster, editor of the DigiChina project at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center.
“The Chinese government also prizes these leading companies as drivers of technological independence. The party would have to perceive significant threats to tear them down,” Webster added.
The action against Ma sends the latest signal that Beijing feels emboldened to risk international fallout from measures meant to address domestic challenges.
Xi defied threats of US sanctions to impose national security legislation on Hong Kong. Crushing Ant’s IPO risked alienating a plethora of powerful global financiers from Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund to the Carlyle Group.
The US has also cited concerns about Chinese government influence over private industry to justify its efforts to force ByteDance to sell the US share of its TikTok social network, and the global campaign to convince allies to swear off equipment made by Huawei Technologies.
Supporters of the US measures often cite Chinese policies such as a 2017 law that requires companies to “support, assist and cooperate” with intelligence agencies.
Like Huawei, Ant has also asserted its independence from the Chinese government, saying in a 2017 application to the US securities regulator that it is “a private sector company and while a handful of Chinese state-owned or affiliated funds own non-controlling minority stakes, they do not participate in company management.”
The CCP has long reached into private firms, including foreign ones operating in China. One way it does that is through the presence of party committees in companies, among them tech enterprises, that are made up of employees.
In addition, it dispatches officials to companies to oversee certain activities. Many tech leaders are also party members, including Ma, Lenovo founder Liu Chuanzhi (柳傳志) and Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei (任正非). Tencent chairman Pony Ma (馬化騰) and Xiaomi founder Lei Jun (雷軍) are delegates to the National People’s Congress.
The CCP’s also stepped in on several occasions to punish executives for mismanagement, including former Anbang Insurance Group chairman Wu Xiaohui (吳小暉).
However, recent efforts to exert government influence over companies and intervene in the business landscape have reached new levels. That has provided fuel to the China hawks in Washington, who say that the CCP exerts too much influence over Chinese companies.
Xi needs business executives on his side to achieve strategic goals such as the “dual -circulation” economic plan focused on domestic consumption, developing secure supply chains and reducing reliance on foreign technology.
While the world’s second-largest economy was the first to rebound from COVID-19, its recovery is showing signs of peaking even as global growth remains sluggish and ties with the US stay fraught.
In a rare direct plea to the business sector in July last year, Xi called on executives, including those from the tech industry, to be more patriotic and help the post-pandemic economic recovery.
“Outstanding entrepreneurs must have a strong sense of mission and responsibility for the nation, and align their businesses’ development with the prosperity of the nation and the happiness of the people,” Xi said.
Weeks later, the CCP revealed plans to tighten control over the private sector by extending its “united front” networking operations further into the business community.
The policy would “strengthen ideological guidance” and “create a core group of private sector leaders who can be relied upon during critical times,” guidelines released at the time said.
“Under President Xi, the CCP has tightened its grip over tech companies and doubled down on its techno-nationalist initiatives,” researcher Alex Capri wrote in a recent report for the Hinrich Foundation. “In addition to placing party officials within prominent companies, it continues to neuter high-profile corporate executives where there is the perception that they were operating independently from party directive or becoming too influential.”
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
The Honduran elections seem to have put China on defense. The promises of trade and aid have failed to materialize, industries are frustrated, and leading candidate Salvador Nasralla, who has increased his lead in the polls, has caused Beijing to engage in a surge of activity that appears more like damage control than partnership building. As Nasralla’s momentum has grown, China’s diplomacy, which seems to be dormant since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 2023, has shown several attempts to avoid a reversal if the Liberal or the National party — which also favor Taipei — emerge as winners in the
RSS