China Airlines last week revealed the new logo for its cargo planes, using a map of Taiwan proper contained within an outsized “C” of the first letter of the word “cargo.” It has been a controversial choice, with some people saying that the design fails to adequately express the desired image of Taiwan.
When it designs the new livery for passenger aircraft, China Airlines must listen to opinion from all quarters of society, Minster of Transportation and Communications Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said, adding that the airline’s International Civil Aviation Organization designator is CAL, so the design must reflect that.
He also said that other airlines use acronyms as identifiers.
I have been an international tour guide for several decades, and have flown on dozens of international carriers. I offer the following three suggestions for Taiwan’s logo, as a reference for the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, the China Aviation Development Foundation and China Airlines.
First, the name China Airlines should be changed to CAL. This would allow it to avoid being confused with Air China, the national carrier of China, which makes people overseas mistakenly believe that China Airlines is China’s national carrier, not Taiwan’s.
In addition, CAL is the airline’s code, so using those letters as an abbreviation would be consistent with the airline’s name. China Airlines’ International Air Transport Association designator is CI, so the company could also use CI or CI Taiwan in its logo.
Japanese airline All Nippon Airways uses the abbreviation ANA on its aircraft, sometimes accompanied with the words “Japan” or “Inspiration of Japan.”
The Netherlands’ flag carrier is Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij, and it uses the initials KLM, whereas German airline Deutsche Lufthansa simply uses Lufthansa.
Second, the word Taiwan could be included in the name, such as by using the Tourism Bureau’s phrase “Taiwan Touch Your Heart,” or even “Taiwan Can Help.” Another option would be to incorporate the word in the airline’s name, such as “Taiwan CAL,”“CAL, Wings of Taiwan” or “Ilha Formosa CAL.”
Third, the company could use an auspicious animal of Taiwan to replace the plum blossom on the aircraft tail fin.
Australian flag carrier Qantas Airways incorporates a stylized kangaroo — an instantly recognizable image associated with Australia, in its tail fin design, conjuring up associations of reliability, safety, advanced technology and quality service — coupled with the airline’s name in capital letters and the phrase “Spirit of Australia.”
Taiwan can lay claim to a whole menagerie of auspicious animals — the leopard cat, Formosan black bear and Taiwan blue magpie would be candidates to represent the nation.
The leopard cat is a rare, protected species. The animal’s name in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) sounds like the Mandarin word for “blessing,” or “wishing somebody well.”
The Tourism Bureau last year invited designer Chiang Meng-chih (江孟芝) to decorate a leopard cat-themed train, and the result is extremely creative and unique.
The Formosan black bear is an endangered species found in Taiwan’s mountainous areas, and is often used by the bureau to promote tourism.
The Taiwan blue magpie was selected in an online competition for an unofficial national animal, and in 2016 China Airlines had it painted on a new Airbus A350, to symbolize the bird’s characteristics of protecting its home and of fidelity.
Any one of these auspicious animals would look very appealing emblazoned on an aircraft.
Lawrence Chien is an English and Japanese-speaking tour guide.
Translated by Paul Cooper
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India