After working at National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) in Taipei, I transferred to the hospital’s Yunlin branch, where I soon learned that many farmers take great care of their crops, but not such good care of their health. I also discovered that there is a difference between having an awareness of Taiwan’s medical landscape and experiencing it.
I knew that Taipei is home to an aging population, but when I worked at the Taipei hospital, I saw that most elderly people arrived at the hospital clinic under their own power.
However, my first impression in Yunlin was that most elderly patients that come into my consulting room were senile and in a wheelchair, or are even arrived lying in a hospital bed, with oxygen equipment to help them breathe.
They might look old, but they are often a dozen-or-so years younger than most of the elderly patients I saw in Taipei. Seeing that they aged so rapidly surprised me and I wanted to find the reason for this.
One day, shortly after I started practicing at Yunlin, the nurse in the consulting room said to me: “Excuse me, but you need to please check each patient a bit faster.”
Hearing that gave me a strange feeling — I have always been careful to spend quality time with patients. The condition of the patient determines how much time I spend consulting and treating them, and no one needs to discuss with me the length of time that I spend with them.
Smiling, I asked the nurse: “What’s the hurry?” She solemnly told me: “Transportation in the Yunlin area is inconvenient. Bus service from the coastal areas to the hospital is only available twice a day — in the morning, a bus brings passengers here, and in the afternoon, another one takes them home. A patient who misses the afternoon bus will have to spend the night sleeping in a chair in the hospital waiting room, and catch the bus home in the morning.”
I was stunned — I would never have imagined that seeking medical treatment in Yunlin could be such a long and arduous journey.
Yunlin has the second-biggest population of elderly people, but county residents generally travel 16km to a bus stop, whereas a bus stop is typically only 300m away in Taipei, New Taipei City and Taichung.
A nurse in Yunlin once told me: “One day when I was on my way into the consulting room to talk with a doctor, a farming woman wearing a head scarf stopped me and asked if she could see the doctor first, because her bus was due to arrive in 20 minutes. If she had missed it, she would have needed to wait until 3pm.”
As a result, elderly Yunlin residents never go see a doctor for a minor ailment — when they do see a doctor, it is because they have a serious condition. When patients only go to see a doctor when it is too late, the doctor often only gets to treat patients who are terminally ill.
This is not only a sad state of affairs, but it is also gut-wrenching.
I began to consider whether there were other ways to offer medical services. People have such difficulty getting to the hospital, why not use advancements in telecommunications to take medical services to where the patients are?
Limited Internet access and slow network speeds used to hamper telemedicine, but the 5G era could mark the beginning of a new generation of elderly care.
This is also the idea that lies behind National Taiwan University Hospital’s Houston-Apollo Model, a telehealth project launched at the Yunlin branch two years ago. This project, the first of its kind in Taiwan, aims to bring medical resources to patients with the help of advanced telecommunications.
Liou Horng-huei is deputy director of National Taiwan University Hospital’s Yunlin branch and a professor of neurology at National Taiwan University’s College of Medicine.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in