Ahead of the 2022 Winter Olympics to be held in Beijing and neighboring cities, China is working overtime to make sure the event is a success.
Beijing has budgeted US$3.9 billion for repurposing and building new venues, and spent an additional US$8.3 billion on a high-speed rail connecting Beijing with another host city, Zhangjiakou.
Under a plan to get the population excited about the event, at least 2,000 schools have been instructed to include winter sports in their curriculum by the end of the year and a giant clock in Beijing counts down the time left before the Games begin. The official slogan is: “Joyful rendezvous upon pure ice and snow.”
Illustration: Mountain People
However, that joyful rendezvous is increasingly under threat as calls for a boycott of the event grow louder.
Earlier this month, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Dominic Raab said that his country would not rule out a boycott, adding that there comes a point when it is “not possible” to “separate sport from diplomacy and politics.”
Last month, more than 160 human rights groups sent a letter to International Olympic Committee (IOC) president Thomas Bach, calling for the Games to be moved from China on the basis of rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong and Inner Mongolia.
Hong Kong activists such as Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) are lobbying countries like Canada, a key contender in the Winter Games, to boycott the occasion.
US Senator Rick Scott has called on the IOC to stand up to Beijing the way it did when the committee banned apartheid South Africa from the 1964 Olympic Games in Tokyo.
In August, former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith, a British member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China with politicians from 16 countries and representatives from the European Parliament, called on the British government to boycott the Olympics, describing China as “dictatorial, aggressive [and] intolerant.”
For Beijing, which would be the first city to host both the Summer and Winter Olympics, the 2022 Games represent a new level of prestige on the international stage — an additional step up from the 2008 event that marked China’s entrance onto the world stage as a major economy. Fewer countries can afford to effectively compete to host the event.
“For China, the 2008 Summer Olympics was their coming-out party,” said Jung Woo-lee, a lecturer in sports and leisure policy at the University of Edinburgh.
“The 2022 Winter Olympics is likely to be a cultural spectacle which declares that China is not only an economic powerhouse, but also a magnet of attractive global culture and high-tech industry,” he said.
The exclusivity of the Winter Games makes a potential boycott all the more threatening. Ahead of the 2008 Olympics, similar calls were made, citing China’s suppression of Tibet and other abuses. A boycott never materialized, but the impact would likely have been minimal, observers say.
“Too many countries would still have taken part in 2008,” said Alan Bairner, a professor of sport and social theory at Loughborough University. “Unlike the Summer Games which involve so many countries that are economically dependent on China, the big Winter Olympics players are less so and if they decide boycott, there won’t be much left.”
The threat of boycott comes as relations between China and some of the main players in the Winter Olympics are at their worst point in decades. China has held two Canadians in detention for almost two years in what many believe to be retaliation for Ottawa’s arrest of Huawei Technologies Co chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟) at the request of the US.
A boycott appears more likely against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. Beijing’s ties with other countries from the US to Australia and the UK, struggling to contain the virus that some blame Beijing for allowing to spread, have deteriorated.
Yet Beijing has so far shrugged off the protests.
“By linking the so-called human rights issue with the Winter Olympics in an attempt to pressure China, certain organizations have made the mistake of politicizing sporting events,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Wang Wenbin (汪文斌) said last month.
However, observers say that momentum is building.
Distrust of China is stronger than before the 2008 Olympics, an event that some hoped would encourage the fast-developing country to liberalize the way that the 1988 Seoul Olympic Games led to political reform and the gradual introduction of democracy in South Korea, then under a military dictatorship.
“Up until the 2008 Beijing Olympics, China had been gradually becoming freer in many aspects of the civil society, so the idea of pushing for China to liberalize through giving it the opportunity to host [an] Olympic Games was an idea that in many people’s mind had genuine potential,” said Yaqiu Wang (王亞秋), a China researcher for Human Rights Watch.
“This approach has not worked. Human rights abuses since [Chinese President] Xi Jinping (習近平) has come to power have gone substantially worse, and China is not responding to condemnations and calls for change,” Yaqiu Wang said. “All of these have made boycotting an approach that is gaining more and more traction.”
Critics and human rights advocates say that one day the international community would regret awarding the event to Beijing, whose policies of mass internment and suppression of Muslim minorities have been revealed over the past few years to increasing alarm.
Jules Boykoff, a professor in the department of politics and government at Pacific University in Forest Grove, Oregon, noted comparisons to the 1936 Olympics in Berlin when Adolf Hitler used the event to showcase Nazi propaganda.
“In a way, one could argue that there were fewer unknowns about China in 2015 when the IOC picked Beijing to host the 2022 Olympics than when the IOC chose Berlin to host the 1936 Olympics,” Boykoff said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with