Digital transformation is undoubtedly one of the most popular subjects this year, as manufacturers grapple with production and supply chain disruptions due to stringent restrictions and lockdowns amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Businesses worldwide have scrambled to buy laptops, servers and cloud-based software such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams to help employees work from home.
Some companies are trying to turn the global health crisis into business opportunities. They have accelerated the adoption of new digital technologies, such as online payment systems, social media marketing or customer relationship management systems, to reach customers stuck at home and recoup losses. Some have made inroads into new areas of business as industrial boundaries begin to blur.
Taiwanese companies apparently do not share the same sense of urgency to optimize their business processes, or create new services to cope with shifts in the market. They are not yet ready to leave their comfort zone, and Taiwan’s success in controlling COVID-19 is the main reason.
As early prevention measures arrested the spread of the virus, Taiwanese companies have been less affected by the pandemic than their counterparts abroad; there were no lockdowns and working from home never took hold. Local companies focused on safeguarding daily operations by taking employees’ temperatures and regularly checking their health conditions to keep the virus out of the workplace.
Digital transformation is lower on corporate executives’ priority list, unless they are forced to take action should the disease trigger an avalanche of revenue losses. As more than 90 percent of local enterprises are small or medium-sized businesses, they often face the dilemma of investing in long-term survival or short-term revenue boosters. Any business transformation carries a risk of failure, but during trying times, it becomes even more difficult to make the right decisions.
Manufacturers this year became more cautious on investing in smart automation, the first step toward digitizing production. About 680 smart machine boxes were installed on equipment in the first eight months of this year, compared with 1,985 last year, according to the Smart Machinery Promotion Office. About 60 percent of local companies have not introduced digital technologies, it said.
Meanwhile, Microsoft Corp CEO Satya Nadella has said that the company has “seen two years’ worth of digital transformation in two months. From remote teamwork and learning, to sales and customer service, to critical cloud infrastructure and security, we are working alongside customers every day to help them adapt and stay open for business in a world of remote everything.”
In Taiwan, most companies have returned to normal with only minor adjustments, with the exception of airlines, retailers and restaurants, which suffered the brunt of the pandemic’s effects in the first half of this year. Without digitizing operations, businesses would be unable to cope with COVID-19 resurgence, and it is hard to say whether Taiwan would be able to prevent an outbreak. Companies would not have the ability to satisfy customers’ needs for rapid shipment times, small orders and diverse production.
Digitization is crucial to enhancing competitiveness. Delaying this transformation will spell problems for companies — manufacturers in particular — during the post-COVID-19 era. Taiwanese firms are facing a high risk of losing their competitive edge or even being eliminated, as they lag global rivals in adopting digital technologies to optimize work flows, enhance efficiency, save costs and upgrade corporate structure.
The government should help cost-sensitive, small and medium-sized companies quickly introduce digital technologies. Building a new platform to provide consultations and digitization solutions would be one feasible approach.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be