Even if there are political disputes between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, they should be resolved through peaceful means. Any use of force or military pressure is unwise, and should be condemned by all nations.
After a delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach arrived in Taipei on Thursday last week, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted military drills for two consecutive days, sending fighter jets to cross into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone.
A Ministry of National Defense news release said that 37 PLA Air Force fighters crossed the median line of the Strait on Friday and Saturday last week, including H-6, J-16, J-11 and J-10 fighters, and a Y-8 transport plane.
Such provocative acts that infringe on Taiwan’s sovereignty have seriously undermined peace across the Strait and in the region.
The ministry has condemned the move in the most solemn terms, and called on Beijing to exercise self-control and not seek to stir trouble.
China’s rapid military expansion in the past few years has had a major impact on the security of the South China Sea and the Asia-Pacific region.
In addition, Beijing’s ever-present ambition to use the PLA against Taiwan has become obvious to the US, Japan and other countries.
Especially in the past few years, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has had the PLA frequently conduct drills around Taiwan’s air defense identification zone with various advanced fighters, and the fleet including the aircraft carrier Liaoning has also entered Taiwan’s southwestern air defense identification zone many times, as well as sailing along the western side of the Strait’s median line
Despite the lack of an obvious threat from an enemy country, the CCP’s military expansion has far exceeded its own defensive needs.
The frequent military drills of various scales conducted in the South China Sea — whether they are declared to be “routine” or using “targeted” live ammunition — have become considerable military threats to Taiwan and its neighbors in the Asia-Pacific region.
Beijing has continuously said that its national defense policy is purely defensive in nature, and China’s development does not pose a threat to any nation.
No matter how far it develops, China would neither seek hegemony nor expand, it has said.
However, the PLA’s provocations aimed at Taiwan in the past few weeks have been serious and are sufficient to prove to the international community that the CCP’s so-called “defensive national defense” is questionable.
The CCP does not walk the talk of the “defensive national defense.”
Taiwan is an important democracy in Asia. It has conducted several presidential elections and transfers of power, receiving lots of attention and praise from the international community.
Several important US officials have visited Taiwan this year, and China has been responding to these events with aircraft carrier exercises of increasingly large scale, military drills and even harassing Taiwan by flying its fighter jets cross the Strait’s median line.
These irrational actions only bolster the will of Taiwanese to resist their enemy.
They also raise awareness of the nation’s security crisis — which is not only not helpful for cross-strait peace, but focuses the world’s attention on two hot topics: “the CCP’s military intimidation of Taiwan” and “security maintenance in the Asia-Pacific region.”
Yao Chung-yuan is an adjunct university professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS