Ezekiel J. Emanuel’s Which Country Has the World’s Best Health Care?, a bestseller in the US published in June, includes a ranking of countries according to the quality of their healthcare services. Although Taiwan does not appear in the ranking, China does, and it is right at the bottom.
However, Emanuel mentions Taiwan, saying that its healthcare provision is different from that in advanced countries.
First, the healthcare environment is crowded, with the public placing high levels of demand on it, he says.
Second, relatives and friends are responsible for providing the patients’ basic daily needs, he says, adding that hospitals expect them to stay by the bedside, look after the inpatient’s daily needs, and perform tasks such as feeding, bathing or changing their drip.
This does not happen in advanced countries. I am pretty sure, that in those places, hospitals do not expect relatives and friends, who have had absolutely no medical training, to perform tasks normally left to the professionals. How can such a system be expected to provide sufficiently high levels of healthcare?
If you only look at specific cases, you would think that the standards of healthcare in Taiwan are extremely high. Think, for example, of the successful operation to separate conjoined twins Chang Chung-jen (張忠仁) and Chang Chung-i (張忠義), the National Health Insurance system or Taiwan’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, all of which have received praise internationally.
Yet hospitals around the country are packed with relatives and friends, with a facility of 1,000 beds having twice that number of people staying there, making noise and denying patients a peaceful environment.
I was deputy head of the National Taiwan University Hospital Nursing Department for 10 years, and the head for another nine.
While I was there, patients and their families often complained of the noise levels, saying it would make it impossible to rest. Once, I had a relative complain that the nurses had not shown them how to dress a wound properly. The woman had seen that the gauze on the patient’s wound was bloody, and even though there were fresh wound dressing materials, medical tape and ointment, she dared not dress the wound herself. In fact, a nurse had shown a previous visitor how to do it, but not the woman in question, who had arrived later.
The nation’s hospitals should look at how things are done in advanced countries, where visitors are limited to designated times, and are there to accompany the inpatients, not perform medical work best left to the professionals.
If Taiwan wants its healthcare provision to be on par with that of more advanced societies, and avoid being an international laughing stock, hospitals should implement a comprehensive nursing system, and recruit adequately trained staff, to take care of all the patients’ needs.
Chou Chaw-fang is former head of the Nursing Department at National Taiwan University Hospital.
Translated by Paul Cooper
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
RSS