Ezekiel J. Emanuel’s Which Country Has the World’s Best Health Care?, a bestseller in the US published in June, includes a ranking of countries according to the quality of their healthcare services. Although Taiwan does not appear in the ranking, China does, and it is right at the bottom.
However, Emanuel mentions Taiwan, saying that its healthcare provision is different from that in advanced countries.
First, the healthcare environment is crowded, with the public placing high levels of demand on it, he says.
Second, relatives and friends are responsible for providing the patients’ basic daily needs, he says, adding that hospitals expect them to stay by the bedside, look after the inpatient’s daily needs, and perform tasks such as feeding, bathing or changing their drip.
This does not happen in advanced countries. I am pretty sure, that in those places, hospitals do not expect relatives and friends, who have had absolutely no medical training, to perform tasks normally left to the professionals. How can such a system be expected to provide sufficiently high levels of healthcare?
If you only look at specific cases, you would think that the standards of healthcare in Taiwan are extremely high. Think, for example, of the successful operation to separate conjoined twins Chang Chung-jen (張忠仁) and Chang Chung-i (張忠義), the National Health Insurance system or Taiwan’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, all of which have received praise internationally.
Yet hospitals around the country are packed with relatives and friends, with a facility of 1,000 beds having twice that number of people staying there, making noise and denying patients a peaceful environment.
I was deputy head of the National Taiwan University Hospital Nursing Department for 10 years, and the head for another nine.
While I was there, patients and their families often complained of the noise levels, saying it would make it impossible to rest. Once, I had a relative complain that the nurses had not shown them how to dress a wound properly. The woman had seen that the gauze on the patient’s wound was bloody, and even though there were fresh wound dressing materials, medical tape and ointment, she dared not dress the wound herself. In fact, a nurse had shown a previous visitor how to do it, but not the woman in question, who had arrived later.
The nation’s hospitals should look at how things are done in advanced countries, where visitors are limited to designated times, and are there to accompany the inpatients, not perform medical work best left to the professionals.
If Taiwan wants its healthcare provision to be on par with that of more advanced societies, and avoid being an international laughing stock, hospitals should implement a comprehensive nursing system, and recruit adequately trained staff, to take care of all the patients’ needs.
Chou Chaw-fang is former head of the Nursing Department at National Taiwan University Hospital.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS