The leadership of the single most powerful governing party in the world was set to meet for an annual retreat this August. Did it? As of this writing, the international media still doesn’t really know.
It’s a bit like this every year.
The meeting at Beidaihe is a big deal. It is where the party leadership takes stock of its future and makes plans for the country it rules. Maybe the CCP’s hyper-secrecy made sense when China was in the midst of civil war or when it was isolated and fomenting revolutions beyond its borders. But given Beijing’s role in the world today — one it would like the world to see as positive — much more information is required of it across the board, from economy to military to public health.
Until it provides it, those not in the CCP — and even those in it, but outside the smallest of concentric circles that make decisions — have to glean what they can from elsewhere.
Luckily, there is a lot of information out there. Earlier this year, the Heritage Foundation started a project called the “China Transparency Initiative” (CTI) to better get at it. The idea is to gather in one place open-source data on China from the many NGOs — American and international — currently mining it. In the process, CTI will help publicize their findings, create opportunities to share methodologies, and discover new avenues of research.
To these ends, Representatives from three of the 20 initiatives that Heritage has so far engaged — Hamilton 2.0 Dashboard, Transparent Development Footprints, and the Mekong Infrastructure Project —described their work in a public program at Heritage.
The Hamilton 2.0 Dashboard is run out of the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMFUS). It tracks Chinese (as well as Russian and Iranian) government and state-funded media messaging on Twitter, YouTube, English-language websites, and UN statements. Quantifying and analyzing the content of these messages offers clues to the objectives of the PRC’s public diplomacy. Reading Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speeches to the likes of the World Economic Forum or Shanghai Import Expo — however out of touch with reality they may be — does that, too. But GMFUS is down in the trenches of the information war deciphering the spin the CCP wants to get out there without necessarily taking credit for it.
For example, among the stories the CCP is most interested in promoting? The dubious Russian claim to have discovered a vaccine for COVID-19. This isn’t speculation or anecdotal. There is always plenty of that. GMFUS judgments are right there in the tweets and retweets.
Transparency Development Footprints is a program of AidData at the College of William and Mary. It is looking specifically at PRC government financing. The program covers 4,300 projects around the world over the last fifteen years. Among the many points of interest in its findings is that, although the US distributes more official development assistance or ODA around the word, the PRC is beating the US by broader measures. That is, when one considers government non-concessional financing and official flows impossible to characterize for lack of information, the Chinese spend more. Africa and Russia are their principal targets.
AidData isn’t a “relic of the Cold War,” as Beijing likes to call efforts to hold it accountable. It is simply making information available so governments around the world can make the best informed decisions about partnering with the Chinese government. In fact, AidData shared its data and methodology with the PRC embassy at its request — something that it was under no obligation to do and had made publicly available in any regard. Not exactly a cold war attitude.
The Stimson Center’s Mekong Infrastructure Tracker sheds light on the most overlooked geopolitical development in the world — China’s growing domination of a 2,700-mile river touching on every country in mainland Southeast Asia. What Stimson is doing is tracking infrastructure development across 1,750 power projects and over 110,000 miles of transportation projects in the Mekong region. Similar to the others, Stimson’s research is not aimed at the PRC exclusively. It is focused on the data. It just so happens that any objective reading of the data points to a massive and unsettling Chinese presence.
The immediate goal of the Heritage initiative is to elucidate what the CCP is really up to, both at home and abroad, in ways that impact US interests and those of its allies. The dream would be for Beijing to render the whole effort redundant by releasing reliable, fulsome information itself.
As things stand, it’s not just the timing of the most important Chinese political gathering of the year that China leaves the world to discover on its own. But for the fine work of many research organizations, the parameters of Chinese power and influence would also be a mystery.
Walter Lohman is director of the Heritage Foundation’s Asian Studies Center.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
The topic of increased intergenerational conflict has been making headlines in the past few months, showcasing a problem that would only grow as Taiwan approaches “super-aged society” status. A striking example of that tension erupted on the Taipei MRT late last month, when an apparently able-bodied passenger kicked a 73-year-old woman across the width of the carriage. The septuagenarian had berated and hit the young commuter with her bag for sitting in a priority seat, despite regular seats being available. A video of the incident went viral online. Altercations over the yielding of MRT seats are not common, but they are
RSS