The leadership of the single most powerful governing party in the world was set to meet for an annual retreat this August. Did it? As of this writing, the international media still doesn’t really know.
It’s a bit like this every year.
The meeting at Beidaihe is a big deal. It is where the party leadership takes stock of its future and makes plans for the country it rules. Maybe the CCP’s hyper-secrecy made sense when China was in the midst of civil war or when it was isolated and fomenting revolutions beyond its borders. But given Beijing’s role in the world today — one it would like the world to see as positive — much more information is required of it across the board, from economy to military to public health.
Until it provides it, those not in the CCP — and even those in it, but outside the smallest of concentric circles that make decisions — have to glean what they can from elsewhere.
Luckily, there is a lot of information out there. Earlier this year, the Heritage Foundation started a project called the “China Transparency Initiative” (CTI) to better get at it. The idea is to gather in one place open-source data on China from the many NGOs — American and international — currently mining it. In the process, CTI will help publicize their findings, create opportunities to share methodologies, and discover new avenues of research.
To these ends, Representatives from three of the 20 initiatives that Heritage has so far engaged — Hamilton 2.0 Dashboard, Transparent Development Footprints, and the Mekong Infrastructure Project —described their work in a public program at Heritage.
The Hamilton 2.0 Dashboard is run out of the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMFUS). It tracks Chinese (as well as Russian and Iranian) government and state-funded media messaging on Twitter, YouTube, English-language websites, and UN statements. Quantifying and analyzing the content of these messages offers clues to the objectives of the PRC’s public diplomacy. Reading Xi Jinping’s (習近平) speeches to the likes of the World Economic Forum or Shanghai Import Expo — however out of touch with reality they may be — does that, too. But GMFUS is down in the trenches of the information war deciphering the spin the CCP wants to get out there without necessarily taking credit for it.
For example, among the stories the CCP is most interested in promoting? The dubious Russian claim to have discovered a vaccine for COVID-19. This isn’t speculation or anecdotal. There is always plenty of that. GMFUS judgments are right there in the tweets and retweets.
Transparency Development Footprints is a program of AidData at the College of William and Mary. It is looking specifically at PRC government financing. The program covers 4,300 projects around the world over the last fifteen years. Among the many points of interest in its findings is that, although the US distributes more official development assistance or ODA around the word, the PRC is beating the US by broader measures. That is, when one considers government non-concessional financing and official flows impossible to characterize for lack of information, the Chinese spend more. Africa and Russia are their principal targets.
AidData isn’t a “relic of the Cold War,” as Beijing likes to call efforts to hold it accountable. It is simply making information available so governments around the world can make the best informed decisions about partnering with the Chinese government. In fact, AidData shared its data and methodology with the PRC embassy at its request — something that it was under no obligation to do and had made publicly available in any regard. Not exactly a cold war attitude.
The Stimson Center’s Mekong Infrastructure Tracker sheds light on the most overlooked geopolitical development in the world — China’s growing domination of a 2,700-mile river touching on every country in mainland Southeast Asia. What Stimson is doing is tracking infrastructure development across 1,750 power projects and over 110,000 miles of transportation projects in the Mekong region. Similar to the others, Stimson’s research is not aimed at the PRC exclusively. It is focused on the data. It just so happens that any objective reading of the data points to a massive and unsettling Chinese presence.
The immediate goal of the Heritage initiative is to elucidate what the CCP is really up to, both at home and abroad, in ways that impact US interests and those of its allies. The dream would be for Beijing to render the whole effort redundant by releasing reliable, fulsome information itself.
As things stand, it’s not just the timing of the most important Chinese political gathering of the year that China leaves the world to discover on its own. But for the fine work of many research organizations, the parameters of Chinese power and influence would also be a mystery.
Walter Lohman is director of the Heritage Foundation’s Asian Studies Center.
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS