The preservation of Gonghe New Village (共和新村) in Pingtung County’s Donggang Township (東港) is probably the most complicated among the nation’s reconstruction projects for military dependents’ villages.
In July 2018, 41 buildings in the village, which were built as dormitories for military officials during the Japanese colonial era, were granted cultural heritage status and listed as “historical buildings” by the Pingtung County Government’s cultural assets review committee. That meant all buildings should be kept, but the villagers who had not moved out were still not satisfied.
The Taipei Times on July 27 that year quoted resident Wang Li-hao (王立皓) as saying that the international understanding is that “a cultural heritage site should cover an entire cultural entity, which includes residents who have lived on a site for many years; it should not just refer to buildings.”
Wang was not particularly happy about the decision, because listing the buildings as cultural assets meant that the eviction of residents would continue.
With fourth generation residents now living in the village, Wang said that gaining cultural asset status to prevent the buildings from being demolished was just the first step, and that there was still a long way to go to before they could fulfill their ultimate wish — to spend their final years in the house where they were born.
Soon after the end of the Lunar New Year holiday last month, Wang expressed concern about a lawsuit filed by the Ministry of National Defense against the village’s community development association, demanding that the land and property be returned. A second court session is to be held next month.
Wang said that during a recent out-of-court mediation, the ministry’s lawyers took a tough stance.
The association is located in the village’s class-1 dorm building, which was damaged by fire a dozen years ago.
It was the association that raised funds and repaired the building, and although official documents about the project were exchanged between residents and the military at the time, the military did not provide a single cent for the restoration, Wang said.
This is a matter of difference in understanding between the government and the implementation of laws on one hand, and residents and expectations on the other. The question is if it would be possible to reach a compromise and find a solution that satisfies both parties.
There were also protests at Jianye New Village (建業新村) in Kaohsiung’s Zuoying District (左營), but the Jianye residents achieved better results. At the time, resident representatives came to me for advice, and I suggested that they reach an agreement with the government that once the land and buildings have been returned, the government should sublet the houses to tenants, who should also be responsible for maintaining them.
Under the agreement, the original residents should have priority to rent the houses, and they should pay the rent on time and fulfill their obligation to maintain the properties.
In April last year, the Kaohsiung City Government approved the applications of seven households in Jianye for certification allowing them to be operated as bed and breakfasts. I have not inquired whether my advice had any influence over this decision.
The preservation of former military dependents’ dorms should not be disconnected from the idea of repurposing and revitalizing the area. The three parties involved — the ministry, the local government and residents — need to sit down and talk, put themselves in each other’s shoes and join efforts to come up with a solution that satisfies the greatest public interest. This is the way to create benefits for all.
For instance, the local government could act as the mediator between residents and the ministry by offering the ministry another parcel of land in exchange. On the other hand, residents could try to add value to the tourism industry and become a “golden goose” for the local government, while academia could lend a hand in establishing the village’s cultural and historical significance.
The most essential element of the revitalization projects is money. Money can be raised by civic groups, outstanding second-generation residents and public representatives. Looking at it this way, the preservation of Gonghe New Village is not a matter between residents and the ministry, but a collective issue that affects everyone.
Miao Cheng-hsi is an assistant professor who grew up in a military village.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS