Teaching courses in English
The article “Universities ordered to improve English offerings” (July 13, page 3) points out some of the problems in improving the teaching of English at universities, but does not consider things as they stand.
The plight of universities in Taiwan teaching courses in English will probably neither be solved either by a mandate from the government nor by throwing money at it. The problems are cultural and institutional, and those aspects need to be considered if the problems are to be solved.
In most universities the senior faculty are not well-versed in English. That leads to a situation in which courses to be taught in English are relegated to junior faculty, typically new employees who obtained their advanced degrees abroad.
That has two consequences: The first is that the courses are being taught by vulnerable young people, the second is that the courses taught in English are usually introductory courses. Both of these have serious consequences.
Vulnerability is a serious issue because students are smart enough to know that most universities rely heavily of “teaching evaluations” by students in their decisions to renew contracts and promote faculty. So students simply tell the junior faculty that if they insist on using English instead of Chinese in the classroom they will give the teacher very poor evaluations and the teacher will have to look for another job.
No matter what the teacher decides to do, problems will follow. If the teacher accedes to the demand, the contract is much more likely to be renewed, but the “English” will remain in title only. The institution might not even know that its nature has changed.
If, on the other hand, the teacher persists in using English, the results might not be much better. In the first place, the students will slow down the learning rate and important parts of the syllabus will be abandoned. This means that the professors who handle intermediate and advanced courses have no guarantee that key requisites will have been complied with and, what might be worse, the students might know the English terminology, but not the Chinese terminology for handling the more demanding work.
Certainly, a great deal of planning is needed. Part of that is to reduce the weight that teaching evaluations play in decisions about rehiring and promotion.
We must also find a way in which courses taught in English present at least the basic words in Chinese and vice versa, so that no matter at what level the English and Chinese courses are scheduled there will be continuity in teaching.
Moreover, we need to find a way to make junior and senior faculty more flexible in the courses they are willing to handle, and to ensure that the promotion of senior faculty gives due weight to the improvement of language skills in both Chinese and English.
Emilio Venezian
New Taipei City
Exposing predatory teachers
The Humanistic Education Foundation exposed an educational scandal involving a Tainan elementary-school teacher surnamed Chang (張), who goes by the nickname “Big Red Hat,” who [allegedly] sexually abused a total of 36 elementary-school students over a period of 20 years.
After the allegations were confirmed last month, the Tainan Bureau of Education immediately dismissed the teacher and said that it would never re-employ him.
Ironically, Chang has frequently given high-profile lectures on his so-called “whole-blackboard projection teaching method,” which has been praised as “a beautiful scene in the field of education.”
According to the foundation’s investigation, Chang started abusing children in his previous school in 2000, but at the time the school principal, for fear of it having a negative impact on his own pension, took gifts of fruit to the parents’ homes and begged them not to report the abuse.
This attitude of smoothing things over and covering them up is what enabled Chang to be transferred to another school, where he [allegedly] went on with his wicked ways, claiming more and more victims as the years went by.
It has been said by senior teachers in the past that the pervasive attitude in schools of everyone not wanting to make trouble is the main reason abusive teachers feel free to go on abusing children.
If legal action were taken against teachers like this when they first started offending, they would have no further victims.
After the case of the abusive teacher was exposed, the bureau completed its own investigation in less than three months, dismissed Chang and completed the procedure of ensuring that he will never work as a teacher again.
This should serve as a warning to the minority of abusive teachers lurking in our schools, and it is in marked contrast with the past conservative attitude in educational circles of smoothing over the problem.
As for Chang’s “whole-blackboard projection teaching method,” teachers can use it to project text and images from a computer onto a blackboard, rather than doing it in a gloomy projection room.
That is a good thing in itself, but the admiring teachers who follow his method should bear in mind that professionalism is the key factor that decides whether someone’s teaching is successful.
Lin Chih-han
Tainan
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS