Taiwanese like to buy insurance policies, but they prefer investment or savings policies over protection policies. Government statistics for last year show that Taiwanese purchased NT$745.2 billion (US$23.57 billion) of savings policies — 54 percent of insurance products sold — to take advantage of the higher guaranteed rates those policies promise. The trend has raised the question of whether many people do not have proper or sufficient coverage.
However, the aggressive marketing of savings policies over protection products has seen the combined premium income of life insurance companies reach new record highs over the past few years, with first-year premiums for last year totaling NT$1.39 trillion.
Many savings policies guarantee rates that are higher than government bond yields, and insurers must take from other investments to continue to pay out high returns and attract policyholders. This kind of investment is a risky and unsustainable long-term strategy, as well as a distortion of the nature of insurance products.
Because savings policies render insurance companies vulnerable to foreign-exchange risks, as most of the investments are overseas, the Financial Supervisory Commission late last month met with 22 life insurers.
It was concluded that the commission would regulate product features and distribution, capital strength, and asset-liability management more strictly in the second half of this year. The commission is pushing insurers to improve their financial and risk profiles with the implementation of new accounting rules — the International Financial Reporting Standards 17 (IFRS 17).
The commission is not banning the sale of savings policies; it is only targeting policies promising unrealistically high returns. Life insurers are expected to lower guaranteed rates on policies to reasonable levels. Although large insurers have financial assets that can withstand risk and fluctuations in the markets, smaller companies who guarantee returns, but have mismatched assets and liabilities, face a particularly high risk of failure.
The commission would prefer that the insurance industry promotes protection products, and plans to reward companies that concentrate on protection policies and prioritize the development of new products that would protect senior citizens.
Industry feedback has been mostly positive. Thus far, Taiwan Life Insurance Co has pledged to stop selling savings policies that promise high returns within one year, while Fubon Life Insurance Co has decided to lower its guaranteed rates for some policies in the second half of the year.
While a slowdown in the sale of savings policies should improve insurers’ asset-liability management, and adjustments in their product features and business mix should help them shore up capital strength ahead of the adoption of IFRS 17 in 2025, some wealth management staff and sales agents might take advantage of buyers as the last savings policies remain on the market. Consumers tend to focus on the short term, rushing in to buy goods because of their rarity, or for psychological factors, while ignoring their true needs.
If the commission does not closely monitor the sale of savings policies with high guaranteed returns by banks and life insurance companies ahead of the launching of stricter regulations later this year, policy sales might run counter to the commission’s plan for an increase in protection policies. A run on savings policies might also result in more consumer disputes.
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
RSS