Technology is often oversold as either a panacea for the world’s problems or an unshakeable curse inflicting disruption and displacement on the most vulnerable, but historically, neither of these characterizations is accurate.
From the steam engine to the personal computer, inventions have transformed societies in complex ways. However, on balance technology has always created more jobs and economic opportunities than it has destroyed. That trend is likely to continue.
Why am I so upbeat? It is because everywhere I look, leaders are repositioning their economies to ensure that technological change and automation are assets rather than liabilities.
As the University of Oxford-based Pathways for Prosperity Commission recently observed, with “optimism and collective action,” so-called frontier technologies can empower even the poorest countries.
For much of modern history, export-driven industrialization and natural-resource wealth were viewed as the only mechanisms for sustained growth in the developing world.
However, new technologies, and the ability to combine them with old innovations, have today given people more say over their economic fortunes.
For example, the Africa Soil Information Service, which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has combined remote-sensing software and open-source data to lower the cost of soil mapping by 97 percent. This has given Africa’s smallholder farmers new tools for making evidence-based decisions about their operations, thereby increasing crop yields and reducing operating expenses.
Similarly, Twiga Foods in Kenya is using technology to optimize its supply chain by matching rural fruit and vegetable growers with small and medium-size vendors in Nairobi. Twiga’s approach has helped farmers access more lucrative markets, increased consumer choice and dramatically reduced post-harvest losses and waste.
Digital inclusion can be a powerful force, particularly for women. Go-Jek, a ride-sharing and food-delivery service in Indonesia, has increased drivers’ income by an average of 44 percent, while connecting many of its suppliers, who are usually women, to banking services for the first time.
To be sure, capitalizing on the transformative potential of technology would require investing more money in people, particularly in women and children.
As we argued in this year’s Gates Foundation Goalkeepers report, better healthcare and education — two pillars of the World Bank’s “human capital index” — can unlock productivity and innovation, reduce poverty and generate prosperity. These gains are essential to countries’ ability to achieve the targets set by the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Harnessing technology would also require sensible economic reforms, better infrastructure, more capable institutions and strategies to deliver digital solutions to marginalized populations.
Some countries are already taking these steps. For example, Indonesia has launched an ambitious program to connect an additional 100 million people to broadband, a recognition of the importance that connectivity plays in fostering economic opportunity.
Yet, for the bulk of the world’s “bottom billion,” basic phone and Internet services remain prohibitively expensive. That is why governments, donors and the private sector must work together to create business and pricing models that allow for cost recovery, while still providing an adequate level of digital service to the poorest consumers.
One poverty-reduction strategy worth exploring is communal access to technology.
Affordability is not the only factor that keeps technology out of the hands of the poor. The digital divide mirrors larger patterns of social discrimination, especially for women. Wherever women live, they are about 40 percent less likely than men to have ever used the Internet, which suggests that social inequities are also driving disparities in digital access.
Closing this gap is vitally important. When women have access to the full range of digital services — from mobile banking to telemedicine — they are generally wealthier, healthier and better educated.
As policymakers in developed and developing countries make decisions and investments that are to shape the landscape in which technological change unfolds, it is gratifying to see countries engaging in meaningful dialogue about their digital futures. As long as citizens who understand technology and its ramifications are included in these conversations, it is possible to design solutions that meet everyone’s needs.
Today’s cutting-edge technologies are evolving at a dizzying speed, but with foresight and preparation, the world can minimize the disruption they will inevitably cause to ensure lasting and inclusive growth.
If we coordinate our investments in people with our spending on innovation, the new “digital age” will leave no one behind.
Mark Suzman is chief strategy officer and president of global policy and advocacy at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS