Yet another case of food safety violations was revealed on Tuesday and some are questioning whether the fines and regulations are adequate deterrents.
Eggs from Yi Jin King Co (義進金), one of the nation’s largest suppliers, were recalled after inspections allegedly uncovered excessive levels of nicarbazin — used to retard parasite reproduction — and fraudulent labeling. Prosecutors said that expired eggs were repackaged with new expiration dates, or mixed with non-expired eggs.
After inspections in April, egg supplier Yuanshan (元山蛋品) was found to have mixed fresh and expired eggs in liquid egg products. Yuanshan and other companies that failed inspections were fined NT$840,000 (US$27,176).
In December last year, egg supplier CJ-Taian Co (萇記泰安) was also found to have mixed fresh and expired eggs in liquid egg products. Suppliers are clearly willing to take the risk, knowing that they face only a small fine if caught.
Compare this with a 2015 incident in the US in which supplier Quality Egg was instructed to pay US$6.8 million after contaminated eggs from its Iowa facilities infected 56,000 people with salmonella. Company executive Jack DeCoster and his son were sentenced to three months in prison and each fined US$100,000.
Taiwanese courts send a confusing message by handling breaches of food regulations with different degrees of severity.
In 2015, Wei Ying-chun (魏應充), the former chairman of Ting Hsin Oil and Fat Industrial Co (頂新製油實業), was sentenced to two years in prison for his role in the company’s use of tainted oil in food products.
The two years — a reduced sentence granted on appeal by the Intellectual Property Court — was for tampering with food labels, the court said.
Why tampering with labels on egg products is treated so much less harshly than tampering with labels on oil products could be questioned, particularly as nobody came forward with claims of health issues caused by the oil products.
Eggs can become contaminated in a number of lethal ways, including with salmonella or listeria — two serious bacterial infections that can cause death in infants, those who are immunosuppressed and elderly people. Listeria infections can also lead to miscarriages, according to the WHO.
As the average Taiwanese consumes 322 eggs per year, the potential for contracting such an infection is high, especially given that egg production facilities are cramped and often fail inspections due to unsanitary conditions.
Exported food products that contain eggs should also be scrutinized. Due to the Ting Hsin oil scandal, Hong Kong authorities last year became stricter about the import of food products from Taiwan, particularly those containing a type of lard produced by Kaohsiung-based Chang Guann Co (強冠企業), which was found to contain recycled kitchen oil.
At the time, Hong Kong Food and Health Bureau Secretary Ko Wing-man (高永文) said that the territory would check Taiwan-made foods — such as pineapple buns from Maxim’s Cakes (美心西餅) — for questionable shortening.
Egg products made in Taiwan, such as salted eggs, preserved eggs (also known as “century eggs”), mooncakes and others, are exported around the world. A major food scandal involving the safety of Taiwanese eggs could harm the nation’s reputation and hamper exports, similar to what happened last year to the Netherlands when eggs from Dutch poultry farms were found to contain traces of the insecticide fipronil.
Taiwanese authorities must not treat cases of food contamination lightly — the safety of the public and the reputation of the nation are at stake.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS