After Wang Yu-ching (王裕慶), a Taiwanese student at Peking University in Beijing, pledged to join the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to become “a participant in the motherland’s great rejuvenation,” Chang Li-chi (張立齊), another Taiwanese student studying at the school, said that he had attempted to apply for CCP membership for years.
Chang accused Taiwan of a lack of freedom of speech and monopoly of thought, saying the government is intolerant politically and “excludes” those who hold different views, as democracy has descended into a tool manipulated by the few.
The successive reports about Taiwanese students pledging loyalty to the CCP are intriguing.
Most Taiwanese saw Chang’s accusations as little more than a joke. If Taiwan were an undemocratic country without freedom of speech, he would have faced more serious consequences than being “excluded” for reading publications about communism.
Also, the pro-communist Taiwanese student’s attack on Taiwan’s democracy was directly reported in the local media, in articles that are accessible to all. Is that not precisely a demonstration of this country’s high degree of freedom of speech? Which authoritarian political regime would ever tolerate such public displays of dissidence?
However, I am more curious as to why, after stories about Taiwanese native Lu Li-an (盧麗安) serving as a delegate to the CCP’s 19th National Congress, media have started to publish this succession of stories about Taiwanese students in China pledging loyalty to Beijing by praising the “motherland” and the CCP leadership, while mocking the country in which they grew up.
It is interesting to note that they are both gifted and talented students at the prestigious Peking University, and that both stories initially broke in specific media outlets in Taiwan. Is it a coincidence, or is it all orchestrated?
In the latter case, the CCP’s underhand United Front approach could be evolving to target Taiwanese young people. The reason for the change in approach is quite obvious: Beijing is trying to influence the “natural independence” (天然獨) generation in Taiwan: people born after the lifting of martial law in 1987 that identify predominantly with Taiwan, not China.
In recent years, the job environment in Taiwan has been challenging, to say the least. Many young people, even those with excellent academic degrees, find it difficult to get a decent job, and low pay is another source of frustration. This happens to be a breakthrough point for the CCP’s United Front work, as Beijing is trying to lure the elite of Taiwan’s young generation over to China with the promise of jobs.
While delivering a report at the opening session of the congress on Oct. 18, Chinese President Xi jinping (習近平) said “Taiwanese compatriots” would enjoy “the same treatment as local people when they pursue their studies, start businesses, seek jobs or live on the mainland,” in an attempt to attract Taiwan’s “natural independence” generation.
We should never think that this is not attractive to young people, as ever more high-school graduates choose to enroll at Chinese universities, instead of taking the college entrance exams in Taiwan. They generally believe that the sooner they start to make contact with China, the better their chances of staying there for their own development.
We should never take it as a joke when Taiwanese students studying at Peking University pledge loyalty to the CCP while making an appeal to Taiwan, because there is a serious political challenge lurking beneath this — and one that is a severe test for Taiwan’s own future.
And yes, this threatens the freedom and democracy that we are so proud of.
Hsu Yu-fang is a professor of Chinese literature at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
Taiwan’s unconditional support “for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India to safeguard national security and fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians” marked a monumental shift in the relationship between Taipei and New Delhi. At a time when the Indian government sent several delegations of parliament members to convey to the rest of the world Pakistan’s role in sponsoring terrorism against India, Taiwan became one of the few nations that unequivocally supported India’s military operation, “Sindhoor.” Sure, this change in bilateral ties did not happen in a vacuum. Over the past decade,