The public tends to expect the central bank to pursue a monetary policy that is anti-inflationary, counter-cyclical and able to balance the needs of exporters, importers, average income earners and big business.
However, the central bank is not all-powerful, so most people have long supported its independence and ability to defend its credibility in the face of market and political pressure.
The central bank on Thursday released the minutes of its June 22 policy meeting for the first time in its history, a move that follows in the footsteps of most major economies to bring greater transparency and communication.
The action also aims to enhance the bank’s accountability, as Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) is expected to step down in February next year, its first change of leadership in 20 years.
The minutes show that the interest rate decision was unanimous — all 15 board members believed that monetary tightening should not be pursued at this stage, considering that inflationary pressure might remain benign in the second half of this year, while economic growth is likely to weaken due to limited export growth and slow upturns in private consumption and investment.
All board members voted to maintain the bank’s rediscount rate at 1.375 percent, the minutes said.
The minutes also revealed the bank’s GDP growth forecast of 2.13 percent and its inflation rate forecast of 1.07 percent for this year, which are not far from the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics’ estimates made in May of 2.05 percent and 0.95 percent respectively.
However, apart from an economic overview by board members, the minutes showed some members’ concerns about the effects of foreign capital flows and a high foreign ownership rate of Taiwanese stocks, as well as worries by other participants about the New Taiwan dollar’s appreciation this year and its tightened effect on the local financial system.
Several members also addressed a narrowing yield spread between US Treasury bonds and Taiwan’s government bonds despite the US Federal Reserve’s consecutive rate hikes this year, and said that its effect on capital flows and currency exchange rates is worth watching.
Overall, the bank’s first-ever release of meeting minutes represents its board’s willingness to communicate with the public, conveying one important message: There was no tightening bias among board members. However, from a long-term perspective, releasing the minutes reveals board members’ views on some key issues and their votes on interest-rate adjustments.
Therefore, it will add pressure on participants to better prepare for subsequent meetings and is likely to foster a more healthy debate on monetary policies.
Even so, there is still room to improve the board’s transparency and accountability in its decisionmaking, because the minutes did not disclose the identity of participants in certain discussions.
Perng, who assumed the position in February 1998, is the nation’s longest-serving central bank governor. The decision to release the minutes sets an example for his successor, as Perng has come to realize the importance of transparency and is all too aware of criticism of his authoritarian leadership style.
However, the real challenges for the future governor and the board lie in accepting that markets are messy places and policy missteps can lead to economic disasters, not to mention acting on the basis of their professional skills and based on their beliefs.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS