The densely packed houses along the Indonesian city of Yogyakarta’s Kali Code River went from drab to a riot of reds, blues, yellows and whites.
Residents did not know who had paid for the elaborate painting job last year. The Yogyakarta press speculated that an unknown company had painted the houses so they would resemble the colorful favelas of Rio de Janeiro.
It turns out the benefactor was Philip Morris International and its “Show Your Colors” advertising campaign. On the side of the Gondolayu Bridge that overlooks the settlements sits a giant picture frame, with tag lines hung above it that read: “Create your own story” and “Go ahead.”
Illustration: Mountain People
The settlement had been transformed into a giant advertisement for a brand owned by the tobacco company.
The ads were another aggressive marketing attempt by an international tobacco company to gain market share in Indonesia. The nation is the second-largest cigarette market in Asia after China, and had the highest male smoking rate in the world — 67 percent, according to a 2011 survey — thanks in part to the popularity of pungent clove cigarettes.
Over the past decade, it has become a last Eden for tobacco companies facing declining smoking rates at home. As late as 2004, international tobacco companies had a marginal presence in the Indonesian market. Today, led by Philip Morris International, they control about 45 percent.
However, that push has been met by an increasingly potent coalition of Indonesian mayors, health officials and anti-smoking groups that has scored some important victories.
In one prominent example, huge cigarette billboards that dominated the highways of the capital, Jakarta, were taken down last year, as part of a move to ban outdoor tobacco advertisements by mayors across the nation.
Many of the lobbying efforts that led to local regulations, including in Jakarta, were substantially financed by the Bloomberg Initiative to Reduce Tobacco Use, the US$600 million fund founded by former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg.
The Bloomberg Initiative has designated Indonesia one of its five priority nations and has donated more than US$10 million since 2007. The initiative is largely focused on establishing local and regional tobacco control laws in a nation with a highly decentralized government structure.
“It’s a battle — like a war,” Yayi Prabandari, a public health professor at Gadjah Mada University in Yogyakarta, said of the clash between tobacco companies and tobacco control organizations.
Before the Bloomberg Initiative became active in the nation nearly 10 years ago, fewer than 10 cities had laws that restricted smoking in public areas, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, which jointly administers the Bloomberg Initiative’s grant programs in Indonesia. Since then, the group says, more than 170 cities have passed laws heavily restricting smoking in public spaces.
However, tobacco growing has deep roots here. Indonesia is one of the few countries in Asia that has not signed the WHO’s Convention on Tobacco Control, which mandates strict limits on tobacco advertising and sponsorship.
The Bloomberg Initiative has also created a backlash from smokers’ rights groups, which portray Bloomberg as a foreign oligarch determined to stamp out Indonesia’s proud tobacco tradition.
“People who smoke today are stigmatized — we’re discriminated against,” said Alfa Gumilang, the chain-smoking secretary-general of Komunitas Kretek, a smokers’ rights group that accepts funds from the tobacco industry.
The Indonesian government relies on the tobacco industry for about 10 percent of state tax revenue. Although tobacco is not nationalized, the government issues growth targets. Last year, the Indonesian Ministry of Industry released a “road map” for the industry calling for expanded cigarette production.
In October last year, Indonesian President Joko Widodo visited the US to promote investment in Indonesia. While he was there, Philip Morris announced a US$1.9 billion expansion of its tobacco factories in Indonesia — the second-largest investment that Joko secured from a US corporation during his visit.
Philip Morris’ success — it controls 35 percent of Indonesia’s tobacco market through its local subsidiary, Sampoerna — ushered in a new age of foreign expansion. In 2009, British American Tobacco purchased Bentoel, a local tobacco company that is now Indonesia’s fourth largest, with about 7.5 percent market share.
According to Indonesian Ministry of Health officials, the nation’s fragmented government ministries often work at cross purposes when tackling the issue.
Because of the difficulty of making sweeping changes to tobacco control laws nationally, Indonesia tobacco control advocates are increasingly pushing for changes at the local and regional levels, where money from the Bloomberg Initiative comes in handy.
Ministry of Health chronic lung disease specialist Theresia Sandra credits the Bloomberg Initiative with helping local governments counter the influence of “big tobacco.”
The group “builds organizations to balance against the strength of industry and opens local governments to the necessity of protecting their communities,” Sandra said.
In one national success, the Indonesian government, with help from the Bloomberg Initiative, passed a law in 2014 requiring manufacturers to put warning labels on cigarette packaging.
The tobacco fight in Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, even extends to the nation’s most powerful Muslim organizations, and shows just how central the issue is for society and the economy.
Muhammadiyah, Indonesia’s second-largest Muslim organization, became the first major Muslim group in the nation to issue an edict declaring that smoking is forbidden in all circumstances, citing smoking’s devastating consequences to public health.
The 2010 decision was significant: Muhammadiyah operates thousands of schools, universities and hospitals across the nation. Almost overnight, those places became smoke-free zones.
However, the Indonesian media quickly pounced on a funding detail. Posted on the Bloomberg Initiative’s Web site was a US$393,000 grant to Muhammadiyah in 2009.
According to Bloomberg’s Web site at the time, the grant sought “the issuance and dissemination of religious advice on the dangers of tobacco use among Muhammadiyah/Islamic institutions.”
Critics accused Muhammadiyah of seeking to unite Muslim opinion against tobacco in return for the grant money.
Sudibyo Markus, who led Muhammadiyah’s health department at the time, said there had never been any quid pro quo.
Meanwhile, religious leaders affiliated with Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Muhammadiyah’s main rival, criticized Muhammadiyah for supposedly bowing to Bloomberg’s money.
However, Nahdlatul Ulama, which does not view smoking as forbidden in most circumstances, receives funding from the foundation wing of Djarum, Indonesia’s third-largest tobacco company.
Nahdlatul Ulama vice chairman Maksum Mahfudh said there was “no relationship whatsoever” between the funding and its decision that it would not forbid smoking.
Moving “drastically” against tobacco would impoverish the farmers and sellers who are “grass-roots people of NU,” he said.
For now, the two sides appear to have fought to a draw. After steadily rising for a decade, the smoking rate has plateaued, according to the Indonesian Family Life Survey, funded by the US National Institutes of Health, that was released last month.
However, Philip Morris International remains optimistic about Indonesia. In a February conference call with investors, chief executive officer Andre Calantzopoulos said Indonesia remained a good bet.
“We remain optimistic about the profit growth opportunities in this key market thanks to its growing adult population and rising income levels,” he told them.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to