Next month, a group of storytelling pioneers will gather in New York City for a future of storytelling summit. Their focus will be on new media and the way it enables some surprising opportunities for interactivity. Yet a story is more than the mode of its telling, so the future is likely to be even more remarkable than these experts predict.
Beneath the medium of story are the gears that drive it. A new form of analysis is emerging that promises to reveal more of that engine, so we can better understand why some tales grip us. If it succeeds, it would fuel new creative forms, more powerful stories and make us less vulnerable to manipulation by governments and companies.
The focus on new media is understandable, because it enables novel relationships. Consider a scenario proposed by Latitude Research, a firm that envisions new intersections of content and technology: Many unconnected people are reading the same book simultaneously, all aiming to reach a particular scene — say, a dance ball — by a certain date. On that day, the readers dress up and attend the ball they are reading about somewhere in their city.
This sort of potential is becoming big business. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg believes immersion in virtual spaces will advance the way we build social narratives. The social networking company recently acquired startup virtual reality firm Oculus for US$2 billion.
However, the excitement surrounding these innovations can miss some important aspects of what we love about stories. New media alone simply changes the mode of the same old tales, whereas the focus on interactivity overlooks a successful tale’s central feature: We often ask storytellers to thrill us in ways that we cannot manage ourselves.
This is where a new method of analysis could help, by modeling a narrative as a river of transforming situations and searching for the forces that propel them forward. Tracking these forces is difficult, because they are usually invisible and spread among many factors. Thanks to new media and technologies, however, some are now becoming more conspicuous.
Consider an example from the action blockbuster genre. The 2007 Transformers movie had a “fractional” structure that deliberately left gaps in the story, to make it more tantalizing. Computer-generated imagery in that film extended the notion visually, changing the way battle scenes unfolded.
In such imagery, a “camera” is an invented perspective, which means the director can point it anywhere. Despite this, the camera in Transformers “saw” and “understood” very little of the fight scenes. It faced the wrong directions, came too close and jumped from view to view, as if its operator did not know what would happen next. Suddenly, a fiction invented for eight-year-old toy consumers became engaging for adults.
TECHNOLOGY TALES
This style of visual confusion has since been extended further, to the level of plot. At the beginning of zombie blockbuster World War Z, a family suddenly flees in panic, but neither they nor the audience know from what. The camera and the protagonists are both anchorless, and the effect is arresting.
Coming technologies will make it possible to see the architecture behind the thrill, along with the way the audience appropriates it afterward. The result could be a greater awareness of why certain tales influence us. Stories already help us decide with whom to fall in love, which politicians to support, where to live, and which goods and services to buy. A deeper understanding of the narratives we consume could improve our quality of life, as it did in the case of food safety.
Only a few generations ago, food corporations could tell any story and be believed. Trans fats were celebrated as a food of the future, while cigarettes were advertised for their health benefits. Corporations and legislators believed that consumers were too lazy and unsophisticated to understand the underlying science.
Today, food is labeled in detail and schools teach children how to interpret this information. Not everyone cares, but the Internet allows anyone to delve as deeply as they wish. None of this was imaginable even 30 years ago, but we are all better off, including the food industry.
Soon the same transparency might be possible for consumed narrative. What advantage might such awareness bring?
ADVICE
Consider a future in which “smart” objects (phones, computers and so forth) monitor the dynamics of the narratives you inhabit, in the same way that they will monitor your physical health.
In private, your phone will advise you why a call to a friend ended badly. Your computer will offer new ways to relate information to improve your work. In a quiet moment, you will ask to see these systems’ inner workings, so that you can view your own ideas nested within those of your family, workplace, or any other environment in which you hope they will find a foothold. You will know when a personal narrative is working well for you, or when it is controlling you instead.
Stories remade with new media and methods may fit us more closely than we can currently imagine, in ways that seem almost like companionship. It is an exciting prospect — all the more so because we are still at the beginning of the tale.
Beth Cardier, a writer, holds a doctorate in narrative structure from the University of Melbourne. H. T. Goranson was a senior scientist with the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and is now building an artificial intelligence system for the entertainment industry.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS