She may have modeled for Ralph Lauren and appeared on the cover of Vogue Italia, but when a photo of Robyn Lawley wearing a corset appeared on Facebook the responses were far from complimentary. “Pig,” “hefty” and “too fat” were some of the ways in which commenters described the 24-year-old. Her crime? Her thighs were touching. Lawley had failed to achieve a “thigh gap.”
The model, who has her own swimwear line and has won numerous awards for her work, responded vehemently below the line: “You sit behind a computer screen objectifying my body, judging it and insulting it, without even knowing it.”
She also went on to pen a thoughtful rallying cry for the Daily Beast last week against those who attacked her, saying their words were “just another tool of manipulation that other people are trying to use to keep me from loving my body.”
Illustration: Mountain People
The response to her article was electric and Lawley was invited to speak about thigh-gap prejudice on NBC’s Today show.
In a careful and downbeat tone, she explained: “It’s basically when your upper middle thighs do not touch when you’re standing with your legs together.”
The Urban Dictionary Web site describes it in no uncertain terms as “the gap between a woman’s thighs directly below the vagina, often diamond shaped when the thighs are together.”
The thigh gap is not a new concept to Lawley, who at 1.88m and 76kg is classified as a “plus-size” model, and who remembers learning about it at age 12. However, the growth of Instagram and other social media has allowed the concept of a thigh gap to enter the public consciousness and become an alarming and exasperating, new trend among girls and women.
A typical example is a Twitter account devoted solely to Cara Delevingne’s thigh gap, which the model initially described as “pretty funny,” but also “quite crazy.”
Selfies commonly show one part of a person’s anatomy, a way of compartmentalizing body sections to show them in the best light, and the thigh gap is particularly popular. What was once a standard barometer of thinness among models is now apparently sought after by a wider public.
The thigh gap has its own hashtag on Twitter, under which users post pictures of non-touching thighs for inspiration and numerous dedicated blogs. The images posted mirror the ubiquitous images of young, slim models and pop stars in shorts, often at festivals such as Glastonbury, in southwest England, or Coachella, in California, that have flooded the mainstream media in recent years, bringing with them the idea that skinniness, glamor and fun are intertwined.
There is even a “how to” page on the Internet, although worshipers of thin may be disappointed to find that the first step is to “understand that a thigh gap is not physically possible for most people.”
Naomi Shimada began modeling at 13, but had to quit the industry when her weight changed.
“I was what they call a straight-size model — a size 6 — when I started, which is normal for a very young girl,” she said.
“But as I got older my body didn’t stay like that, because, guess what, that doesn’t happen to people! So I took a break and went back in as a size 14 and now work as a plus-size model,” she said.
Shimada is unequivocal about where the obsession with the thigh gap comes from.
“It’s not a new trend: It’s been around for years. It comes partly from a fashion industry that won’t acknowledge that there are different ways a woman should look, and it comes from the pro-anorexic community. It’s a path to an eating disorder,” she said.
Caryn Franklin, the former presenter of British fashion TV program the Clothes Show who cofounded the diversity campaign All Walks Beyond the Catwalk, is quite appalled.
“We now have a culture that convinces women to see themselves as an exterior only, and evaluating and measuring the component parts of their bodies is one of the symptoms,” she said.
“Young women do not have enough female role models showing them action or intellect. In their place are scantily clad celebrities. Sadly, young women are wrongly looking to fashion for some kind of guidance on what it is to be female,” she said.
Franklin, who was fashion editor of style magazine i-D in the 1980s, says it has not always been this way.
“I had spent my teen years listening to Germaine Greer and Susie Orbach talking about female intellect,” she said.
“When I came out of college, I knew I had a contribution to make that wasn’t based on my appearance. I then landed in a fashion culture that was busy celebrating diversity. There was no media saying ‘get the look’ and pointing to celebrities as style leaders because there wasn’t a homogenized fashion look, and there weren’t digital platforms that meant that I was exposed to more images of unachievable beauty,” she said.
Asked whether the fixation on skinny thighs is a way of forcing women’s bodies to look pre-pubescent, Franklin said: “This culture has encouraged women to infantilize themselves. When you are so fixated on approval for what you look like, you are a little girl: You haven’t grown up.”
For many, the emergence of the thigh gap trend is baffling.
“About four hours ago, as far as I was concerned a ‘thigh gap’ was something anyone could have if they stood up and placed their feet wider than hip distance apart,” Vice magazine journalist Bertie Brandes wrote when she discovered the phenomenon.
“A thigh gap is actually the hollow cavity which appears between the tops of your legs when you stand with your feet together. It also means that your body is underweight,” she wrote.
Other bloggers have responded with a sense of the absurd; feminist blog Smells Like Girl Riot recently posted a diagram of a skeleton to show why the ischium and the pubis cannot be altered through diet alone.
Shimada, now 26, is about to launch her own fanzine, A-Genda, which aims to use a diverse range of models to show young women “something healthy to aspire to.”
“When I was a really young model, there were girls who used to talk about the pencil test, which is when you measure the depth of your waist against the length of a pencil, and back dimples, when the lack of fat would create concave areas of skin,” she said. “But I don’t even think this kind of thing is limited to the fashion industry anymore. It’s all a big mess, but we all have to play a role in making it better.”
“When did everyone become so narcissistic? What happened to intellect?” she added. “My sense of myself was not informed by a very shallow patriarchal media that prioritized the objectification of women — it was informed by feminism.”
Lawley signed off her call to arms with a similar acknowledgement of the potential power of women’s bodies.
“I’ve been trying to do just the opposite: I want my thighs to be bigger and stronger. I want to run faster and swim longer. I suppose we all just want different things, but women have enough pressure as it is without the added burden of achieving a ‘thigh gap,’” she said.
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other