It is rare that the head of one branch of the government should directly attack the head of another branch, but that is what Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien did last week, when he said President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) ran the risk of turning himself into one of the most incompetent presidents in history. And that was even before the Cabinet gave the thumbs-down to the Council of Labor Affairs’ proposal to increase the minimum wage and then set absurd criteria for raising it.
Wang wrote in an article that bureaucratic mindlessness was defining Ma’s legacy, citing as an example Ministry of the Interior officials who kept insisting that care centers for vegetative patients with 60 or more patients meet the minimum requirement of one bathroom for every six patients to be licensed, even though patients in vegetative states cannot use bathrooms. It took years of petitioning from concerned families before the officials finally agreed to accept reality and reduce the number of required bathrooms.
As president and the person who had chosen the head of the interior ministry and other Cabinet agencies, the buck stopped with Ma, Wang implied.
Even if you cannot fault Ma for the ineptness of lower-level ministry staffers, he certainly can be held accountable for the appointment of Premier Sean Chen and, therefore, the minimum wage ruling.
That same inability to accept reality that created a logjam in the interior ministry also tainted the Cabinet’s decision on Wednesday to put off a plan to raise the minimum monthly wage by NT$267. Chen said the minimum wage would be raised only if GDP grows by more than 3 percent for two quarters in a row or the unemployment rate drops below 4 percent for two consecutive months.
Welcome to Fantasy Island — you can guess who is playing the role of Ricardo Montalban and who is guesting as Herve Villechaize this year. However, unlike on Fantasy Island, dreams rarely come true here. This is the island where government officials like to make expansive promises about the nation becoming some kind of Asian-Pacific hub that will outperform its neighbors and wow investors enough that they will want to set up headquarters — and continue to make such promises (though with different hubs) despite years of not being able to meet a single goal. They keep waiting for the next planeload of visitors to arrive to make those dreams come true — even though planeloads of Chinese tourists have yet to boost the economy as promised.
Taiwan is having a hard time keeping its GDP growth above 1 percent right now, while the unemployment rate during Ma’s time in office has never gone below the 4 percent mark, so 3 percent GDP growth truly looks like a fantasy right now. Chen said he was confident that the conditions could be met, even though he was not willing to set a timeframe and few outside the government appear as optimistic. He said the decision was made after considering “all factors,” but it seems as if the only factors that counted were those put forth by big business.
And if that were not enough for Taiwan’s beleaguered working class, hot on the heels of the minimum wage announcement came the news that the government is planning to relax restrictions on the recruitment of foreign workers to help revive the economy. The one who made that announcement was Minister Without Portfolio Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔), who just happens to be one of two men charged by Chen to review the minimum monthly wage proposal and who said it should be deferred until the economy was better. It goes without saying that the foreign worker plan includes the stipulation that they not be subject to the minimum monthly wage rule as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法).
The Democratic Progressive Party has said it was considering reporting the Cabinet to the Control Yuan over the minimum wage ruling. It should. At least there is one avenue of appeal for that, but what about all the other misguided policies being fronted by Ma and Chen? Their fantasy island risks sinking beneath the waves before they wake up to reality — and taking us all down with it, one worker at a time.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India