It is interesting to see how one company’s business can impact on a nation’s economic performance. The latest trade data, released last week, illustrated the real weight of smartphone maker HTC in Taiwan’s export-reliant economy. The data showed that Taiwan’s exports totaled US$24.85 billion last month, down 11.6 percent from a year earlier. In the first seven months of this year, accumulated exports dropped US$10.57 billion, or 5.8 percent, to US$171.6 billion from last year.
The government blamed the continual fall in exports on global economic uncertainties, which are affecting the world’s demand for Taiwanese-made goods, especially information technology (IT) and communications products. Based on the latest data, outbound shipments of these products, which include computers and mobile phones, posted a contraction of 34.5 percent — the largest contraction among the nation’s 10 major export sectors. In addition, declining sales of HTC products (which dropped NT$20.08 billion (US$670 million) last month on an annual basis) helped push down the sector’s figures for the month, the government said.
Overall, shipments of IT and communications products in the first seven months showed the biggest decline of 23.3 percent of all the 10 major export segments, down US$2.77 billion to US$9.09 billion from a year earlier. Perhaps coincidentally, HTC’s revenue during the January-July period totaled NT$183.85 billion, a decline of NT$89.82 billion from the same period last year — this more than covers the nation’s lost sales in this sector in the year to date.
Since Taiwan’s exports have fared far worse than the exports of its major trading partners so far this year, economists have suggested that the nation should transform its industrial structure and diversify exports beyond the IT, communications and electronics sectors. South Korea, for instance, has a more balanced approach to the development of its export profile, which encompasses semiconductors, petrochemicals, cars, ships and mobile phones.
There are also suggestions that the government should help HTC, but is this a good idea? Take Nokia and Motorola, once the world’s phone giants, as examples. Whether to bail out Nokia has been a national debate in Finland for some time, with some Finnish people deeply concerned that their national product of pride could face a foreign takeover. Last month, however, Finnish Prime Minister Jyrki Katainen told reporters that the state would not buy Nokia shares, saying the company’s problems such as declining global competitiveness are none of the government’s business. Meanwhile, the US government’s decision not to bail out Motorola has meant the US firm instead used its stockpile of patents as a bargaining chip to become a unit under Google with the hope they may have a turnaround in the future.
Given that it needs no emergency cash to settle debts, HTC is in a better situation than both Nokia and Motorola. The question here is: What role should the government play in helping the country’s biggest smartphone maker? The government must keep in mind that its role is to look after the interests of other important industries, so what it should do is improve the domestic business environment for local industries — tax, land and labor regulations, for example — rather than save individual companies.
HTC has for years shown the world how a Taiwanese company can move up the global corporate ladder and develop a brand. The company’s major setback this year is due to its late response to market fluxes; it needs to overcome these difficulties by offering more competitive products, investing more in research and development, increasing patent purchases and deepening its foothold in emerging markets.
The case of HTC should provide a lesson to other Taiwanese companies that challenges are always on the horizon. This episode should also remind the government that its efforts should be directed toward strengthening local industries, not individual companies’ short-term survival.
There are two space races that the democracies must win: one to deter military campaigns near Earth, and the other to secure positional deterrence on the Moon and beyond. The good news is that the US is engaged in both races, which will also benefit US allies and partners in Asia, including Taiwan. On Sept. 14, US Air Force Secretary Troy Meink disclosed, “...the US now has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action.” No details about these “space control weapons” have yet been disclosed. However, a graphic apparently issued by French Space Command and posted
Taipei’s school lunch program has run into trouble yet again. This time, Shilin District’s (士林) Shihtung Elementary School (士東國小) was exposed by parents on social media for serving rotten, blackened pears. The incident once again sparked criticism about food safety in Taipei schools and the quality of the city’s free lunch policy. Free school lunches for all elementary and junior-high schools is a flagship policy announced by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) in January, but at the time it attracted criticism from other administrative regions. Since the policy’s official implementation last month, the city — which has the largest budget
Upon entering Taipei Railway Station, what greets us at the interchange of Taiwan’s three major rail systems are not testimonies to the city’s technological development or cultural heritage, but an inescapable barrage of cosmetic surgery and aesthetic medicine advertisements. Advertising itself has always been more than commercial activity; it is a manifestation of the collective unconscious. When the entranceway of the nation is lined with legions of cookie-cutter perfect faces and plastic surgery adverts, it both reveals and provokes society’s collective body-image anxiety. From a psychological perspective, these advertisements are an exercise in social conditioning of the public. They do
Diplomats are paid to say unpleasant things pleasantly. Chinese Ambassador to the Philippines Jing Quan (井泉) has managed the opposite. Asked on Oct. 15 about Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro Jr’s description of China as the region’s lone troublemaker, he called the remark nonsense, then observed that China “may easily win” against the Philippines, but declines to use force because it loves peace. A threat dressed as a compliment is still a threat, and Manila heard it correctly. Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Maria Theresa Lazaro on Monday last week summoned Jing to express her concerns about the