It is interesting to see how one company’s business can impact on a nation’s economic performance. The latest trade data, released last week, illustrated the real weight of smartphone maker HTC in Taiwan’s export-reliant economy. The data showed that Taiwan’s exports totaled US$24.85 billion last month, down 11.6 percent from a year earlier. In the first seven months of this year, accumulated exports dropped US$10.57 billion, or 5.8 percent, to US$171.6 billion from last year.
The government blamed the continual fall in exports on global economic uncertainties, which are affecting the world’s demand for Taiwanese-made goods, especially information technology (IT) and communications products. Based on the latest data, outbound shipments of these products, which include computers and mobile phones, posted a contraction of 34.5 percent — the largest contraction among the nation’s 10 major export sectors. In addition, declining sales of HTC products (which dropped NT$20.08 billion (US$670 million) last month on an annual basis) helped push down the sector’s figures for the month, the government said.
Overall, shipments of IT and communications products in the first seven months showed the biggest decline of 23.3 percent of all the 10 major export segments, down US$2.77 billion to US$9.09 billion from a year earlier. Perhaps coincidentally, HTC’s revenue during the January-July period totaled NT$183.85 billion, a decline of NT$89.82 billion from the same period last year — this more than covers the nation’s lost sales in this sector in the year to date.
Since Taiwan’s exports have fared far worse than the exports of its major trading partners so far this year, economists have suggested that the nation should transform its industrial structure and diversify exports beyond the IT, communications and electronics sectors. South Korea, for instance, has a more balanced approach to the development of its export profile, which encompasses semiconductors, petrochemicals, cars, ships and mobile phones.
There are also suggestions that the government should help HTC, but is this a good idea? Take Nokia and Motorola, once the world’s phone giants, as examples. Whether to bail out Nokia has been a national debate in Finland for some time, with some Finnish people deeply concerned that their national product of pride could face a foreign takeover. Last month, however, Finnish Prime Minister Jyrki Katainen told reporters that the state would not buy Nokia shares, saying the company’s problems such as declining global competitiveness are none of the government’s business. Meanwhile, the US government’s decision not to bail out Motorola has meant the US firm instead used its stockpile of patents as a bargaining chip to become a unit under Google with the hope they may have a turnaround in the future.
Given that it needs no emergency cash to settle debts, HTC is in a better situation than both Nokia and Motorola. The question here is: What role should the government play in helping the country’s biggest smartphone maker? The government must keep in mind that its role is to look after the interests of other important industries, so what it should do is improve the domestic business environment for local industries — tax, land and labor regulations, for example — rather than save individual companies.
HTC has for years shown the world how a Taiwanese company can move up the global corporate ladder and develop a brand. The company’s major setback this year is due to its late response to market fluxes; it needs to overcome these difficulties by offering more competitive products, investing more in research and development, increasing patent purchases and deepening its foothold in emerging markets.
The case of HTC should provide a lesson to other Taiwanese companies that challenges are always on the horizon. This episode should also remind the government that its efforts should be directed toward strengthening local industries, not individual companies’ short-term survival.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to