Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) was not kidding when he recently warned that improving cultural ties with China would face more challenges. He was speaking about the brouhaha over Chinese delegation head Jiang Ping’s (江平) tyrannical outburst at the Tokyo International Film Festival, where he insisted that Taiwan take part under a Beijing-blessed name, such as “Chinese Taipei” or “Taiwan, China.”
The nerve, the nerve.
It’s one thing for Beijing to insist on playing by its own rules inside China, but to start pushing around sovereign countries like Japan and Taiwan is unbelievable. And yet it happened, and it will happen again. Wu tried to downplay the whole fiasco by trying to paint Jiang as a loose cannon, who did not have the blessings of his handlers in the Chinese Communist Party.
“Occasionally, there will be one or two Jiang Pings,” Wu said in the legislature. “It is unavoidable.”
What he meant, in fact, was that there will always be a dozen Jiangs and they will continue to act in full coordination with their minders in Beijing whenever they get the chance. This is the Beijing playbook.
As seen in recent events this year, China doesn’t only try to push Japan around. It also tried to push the Philippines around in the aftermath of the tragic hostage crisis in Manila when a retired police officer shot up a bus full of Hong Kong tourists. When the policeman was buried in his home province, local authorities — in consultation with the dead man’s family — draped a Philippine flag over the coffin during the funeral.
China’s ambassador in Manila had the effrontery to demand that the Philippine flag be taken off the casket. When will China learn that it cannot dictate how other countries bury their dead, whether they be heroes or tragic saps?
What’s next? Beijing will tell US President Barack Obama how to tie his tie and what color shoes he can wear?
China is getting too big for its own britches and it’s high time the entire world call Beijing on the carpet and tell it to start behaving like a civilized country — if indeed it is a civilized country, and many old China hands have their doubts. Jiang’s obnoxious and prissy outburst in Tokyo was not an isolated incident.
Jiang should be listed as persona non grata in Taiwan and his unbecoming antics in Tokyo should be remembered by all of China’s neighbors in Asia anxiously watching Beijing’s so-called “peaceful rise” region-wide. China is about as peaceful as a slumbering volcano ready to vent. It bears careful watching, and not only by its neighbors. The West needs to wake up to Beijing’s shenanigans, too.
Jiang is a caricature of China’s brainwashed nationalists. He is not alone in his animosity toward Taiwan; there is a whole army of mind-controlled bureaucrats behind him, and he represents what China wants to become, if it is not checked by Tokyo, Washington, Canberra and London.
China is a master of international public relations and after basking in the 2008 Summer Olympics it thinks it can do whatever it wants, not only inside Beijing, but also in Tokyo and Manila and Washington. It won’t be long before another Jiang lurches forward at a press conference in Washington and tries to push another Falun Gong follower to the ground.
It’s going to get ugly.
Dan Bloom is an American writer based in Taiwan.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS