What’s in an ECFA?
Dear Johnny,
After having read so much but learning so little about the economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) between Taiwan and China, I have deduced that the real answers to its mystery lie within its acronym.
So, without more ado, I set out to decipher this Da Vinci Code and came up with these gems — in no particular order.
ECFA:
1. Economically Challenged Fraud Artists
2. Extraordinarily Crafted False Advertising
3. Eunuch Council of Formosan Affairs
4. Emporium for China’s Free-for-All (read: Taiwan)
5. Egregious Chinese Flimflam Agreement
6. Enter China Fomenting Ague
7. Easily Caught Formosa Asleep
8. European Coalition of les Francais et les Anglais (read: beer)
Then there’s the Regular ECFA with three noes, two yesses, one maybe and a no-holds-barred let-me-get-back-to-you should Taiwan not sign the agreement. With this one, put on your sunglasses and say, in Hoklo, “I don’t like the feeling of being a loser.”
Yeah, right: My Google-eyed neighbor across the puddle is pointing all those guns at my productivity, and I’m going to sign a business deal?
Like a true Wind Talker, I changed the order of the acronym and came up with this: FACE — Forego All Chinese Effrontery.
Finally, I had an epiphany. The real answer lies within this abbreviation.
MPFC:
Monty Python’s Formosan (flying, swimming, crawling, swallowing, choking, begging) Circus.
Now I may sleep well.
Kevin Robert Larson
Chiayi
Johnny replies: Didn’t Samuel Beckett write a play called Waiting for ECFA?
I think I might have read this somewhere, but all this ECFA stuff is beginning to resemble a cargo cult, except with the white people and Austronesian natives replaced by the Chinese market/government complex and Taiwanese industry.
We can expect that the thousands and thousands of temples and altars around this fair island will be physically and scripturally modified to accommodate the Chinese FTA Facilitator God, the Suspension of Moral Universe God, the Sage of the Temporary Wealth Spike and the Belated and Ineffectual Nationalism Demon.
Religion is the opiate of the masses? I never thought this aphorism applied much to Taiwanese, because for so many of us, getting attached to the local temple was a stepping stone to something more powerful, something more meaningful, something more educational, or at least something more profitable.
That may now change. Pass the incense and the ECFA pipe, venerable master.
My real problem, however, is that your cheap jokes have upstaged my even cheaper ones that were destined for a future column.
So, to be honest, Kevin, this Expiring Columnist Feels Antipathy.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with