The Hong Kong entertainment world scandal this Lunar New Year over the spread of Edison Chen's (陳冠希) sex photos on the Internet has revealed as much -- or more -- about the media and the public as about Chen and his ex-girlfriends. It is alleged that the computer shop that Chen had sent his laptop to for repair somehow managed to get ahold of the pictures and posted them on the Internet.
The local police are still investigating how the photos of Chen, a young pop idol, were leaked, while new photos continued to be uploaded on the Internet. CNN blamed Chen for his failure to protect his ex-girlfriends.
Gillian Chung (
The fact that she had to face the public to explain the incident shows that a woman's lust for sex still carries a stigma that can turn an innocent- looking pop singer into a "slut" overnight.
With the advance of electronic technology, more and more people are filming their own porno movies to spice up their sex lives. And according to the new code of morals, this act does not necessarily make somebody a pervert. Chung should not be seen as a slut simply because she had pictures taken during sex. In fact, exposing herself to the media's numerous cameras to apologize to the public was quite unnecessary.
These photos only showed that celebrities, too, have sex lives, nothing more. Let's not forget that she and the other girls and even Chen are all victims of the incident. The public should focus on her professional performance instead of her private life. Chen may be stupid enough to place his private photos in a position where they could be stolen, but that doesn't mean there was a "dirty" secret to hide. They are just a bunch of pictures that reveal human beings' instinctive craving for the joy of sex.
In fact, those who should take the blame for the incident are the people who leaked the photos, those who downloaded them, and the media who made it headline news everyday. Curiosity can indeed kill a cat. Let's pray that the victims of the incident, under close moral scrutiny from the public and the media, will not take extreme measures to escape forever from the gaze of the cameras.
If the incident holds a lesson for the public, it is to never trust the guy you turn your laptop over to.
Wei-ling Chen
Taipei
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights