"God created, Linnaeus organized." Those are the words of Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus, the scientist who developed the modern system of classification of nature and who was born 300 years ago.
To celebrate the tricentenary of Linnaeus' birth on May 23, 1707, festivities, exhibits, conferences and floral events will be organized in Sweden and around the world this week.
In his groundbreaking book Systema Naturae, published in 1735, Linnaeus, also called Carl von Linne, the name he was given after he was knighted by the Swedish king in 1757, classified the animal, plant and mineral worlds, defining each species by a double name in Latin.
Under this binomial nomenclature, the first name referred to the genus and the second a specific "shorthand" name. It was Linnaeus who coined the term Homo sapiens, a species that he classified among primates.
"He named 8,000 different flora and around 4,000 to 5,000 animals ... most of the vegetable kingdom around us," said Carl-Olof Jacobson, a retired zoology professor at Sweden's Uppsala University and the chairman of the Swedish Linnaeus Society.
Born in Raashult in southern Sweden as the son of a pastor, Carl Linnaeus was fascinated by plants and flowers from an early age. He went on to study medicine at Lund University and then Uppsala University, where he became a professor.
He received his medical degree in the Netherlands, where he lived for three years.
Jacobson said Linnaeus was a "revolutionary professor" who regularly took his students on excursions -- he called them "herbations" -- to study nature.
At Uppsala University, the classrooms "were always packed when Linnaeus was teaching a class, attended not only by medical students but anyone who was studying at the university and even people who weren't studying." he said.
Many of Linnaeus' students, which he called his "apostles," crossed the seven seas and braved terrible illnesses, which sometimes claimed their lives, to conduct research. They traveled to South Africa, China, Japan, Australia, Russia, Siberia and North and South America, among other destinations.
Linnaeus, a father of seven who became the physician to the Swedish royal family in 1757, was not only engrossed in medicine, botany, zoology and geology. He was also interested in the Swedish economy, and in 1739 he and a group of other scientists founded the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in order to promote research to help the country's industries.
Ethnography also interested him, and he observed and described Swedish customs and traditions with a particular emphasis on folk dances.
Linnaeus was also a man ahead of his time with his particular interest in ecology, Jacobson said.
"He believed that man had a responsibility to the world we live in, that man was part of it and not superior to it," he said.
While most of Linnaeus' research was conducted in Sweden, his work was spread throughout the world, in part thanks to his correspondence with hundreds of other international researchers.
In Sweden, the tricentenary celebrations of his birth have been going on since the start of 2007 and will culminate this week.
Japanese Emperor Akihito, a marine biologist who is a fan of Linnaeus, will attend special ceremonies today in Uppsala, with other events during the week attended by former UN secretary general Kofi Annan, British documentary filmmaker David Attenborough and primatologist Jane Goodall.
Festivities will be held to mark the anniversary in Japan, where flora and fauna were categorized by one of Linnaeus' students; in Britain, where most of Linnaeus' collection is now located; in the Netherlands where he lived; and in Russia, Italy and China, said Mats Bergquist, one of the organizers of the tricentenary.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the