The buzz about merger talks between local and foreign banks in the wake of Standard Chartered's move to acquire Hsinchu International Bank two weeks ago has diverted public attention from BenQ Corp's failure to turn around its money-losing German handset unit
That's good news for BenQ, given the growing speculation that it might drop its own-branded cellphone business after the company announced plans last month to discontinue investment in its German subsidiary BenQ Mobile and seek bankruptcy protection. Worse, the German public and political opinion have turned against Siemens, as well as BenQ, because of their commitment to retain the jobs of the unit's 3,000 employees in Germany.
So far, the quest to acquire trusted foreign brands to help Taiwanese companies expand their sales and image internationally has not been successful.
Three years ago, consumer electronics brand Sampo Corp made a last-minute exit from a nearly US$100 million deal to buy a controlling stake in the Nuremberg-based Grundig AG, when European banks refused to underwrite a loan of US$430 million for the purchase. Sampo said that without the loan, the ailing Grundig could have depleted its financial resources in just a few months. But Sampo was already having trouble managing skeptical regulators, unions and other stakeholders throughout the acquisition process. That did not bode well for its ability to handle the assets of its German target.
Toppoly Optoelectronics Corp is still trying to integrate the management of Royal Philips Electronics' mobile display unit, which it bought almost a year ago in a bid to become the leader in the world's small and medium-sized display panels.
Whether Toppoly can bridge the geographical and cultural divides between its Dutch unit and its Taiwanese headquarters remains questionable. The company is scheduled to embark on a new round of corporate reorganization by the end of this month.
In an era of international mergers and acquisitions (M&A), strategic considerations are what draws attention of potential buyers looking to expand their regional operations. Standard Chartered was attracted by the Hsinchu bank's underexploited branch network, particularly in the area of wealth management and wholesale banking. Both BenQ and Sampo were tempted by their German counterparts' established brand names and intellectual property. Toppoly was interested in the customer base and manufacturing capacity the Philips subsidiary had on offer.
There is plenty of blame to go around when it comes to failing to achieve a cross-border M&A. In bidding farewell to its German subsidiary, BenQ blamed constant delays in handset research and development and a non-competitive cost structure for the failure of its foray into Western markets. Anyone who believed those claims, however, should really take a minute to consider the real challenge -- integrating the management of the company's local and foreign business units.
For example, disagreements or miscommunication between BenQ's German management and Taipei headquarters over the development process of new products and the speed of reorganization highlight some of the difficulties of integration. BenQ's decision to cut its financial support for the German subsidiary was condemned as rash and irresponsible in Germany, while it was deemed rational to many in Taiwan.
Bridging the gap between Taiwanese companies and their overseas subsidiaries is both time and money consuming, without any guarantee of success. To succeed, companies must select the right acquisition targets, make careful risk calculations and make sure that the integration of management occurs across the board.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS