The unpredictability of former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
Two articles on Sept. 22 in the Los Angeles Times -- "Daily protests snap at Taiwan leader's heels" and "China accused of reneging on rights pledge" -- discuss Shih's undertaking and the future of Taiwan if Shih gets his way.
A Beijing-based Taiwan analyst was quoted in the first article as saying: "This situation makes us [China] confident there won't be real independence activities at this stage. They're too busy with their own problems."
That can only imply that Shih's event has so far served Beijing's causes. The comment, however, has hardly put a dent in the speculation that Beijing has a hand in the anti-Chen campaign.
While the report lacks direct proof, meaningful inferences can still be drawn based on reports that Shih's inner circle boasts the participation of bigwigs from Taiwan-based media outlets with links to Beijing.
Circumstantial evidence of Beijing's involvement abound, including the unmistakable symbolism of the sit-in's starting day -- Sept. 9 -- coinciding with the anniversary of the death of former Chinese Communist Party chairman Mao Zedong (
As the saying goes, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.
Furthermore, looking past the article's critical tone, one couldn't help but be surprised by what Chen has managed to do for Taiwan's democracy and consequently for the nation's security -- the headwind from both Beijing and Washington notwithstanding.
Chen was faulted for wanting "the electorate to vote on whether Taiwan should seek to join the United Nations using the name Taiwan rather than the official Republic of China," for engineering "passage of a law legalizing referendums" and for, earlier this year, dissolving "a symbolic unification council."
On top of these "criticisms," the article could also have added Chen's push to adopt a new constitution "custom-made for Taiwan," alluding to the fact that the nation's current Constitution lacks relevance to Taiwan and that this must be remedied lest it threaten the functioning or even the survival of the nation's democracy.
These might all seem "too little and too late" for the pan-green camp, which feels perpetually frustrated by Chen's propensity to let down the independence-leaning end of the spectrum once elections are over.
But these meager accomplishments are precisely what has stoked the deep-blues personal hatred of him.
What has been intentionally overlooked is the fact that Chen's principle duties -- with safeguarding national sovereignty at the top of the list -- are ignored as a yardstick for his performance.
The subject of graft, especially at the scale that has been alleged against Chen, should therefore be dismissed as a ruse, deployed at least partially to divert the public's attention from focusing on the flawed morality of presidential hopeful and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
But, reportedly, some members of the KMT have taken this deception seriously and conducted a signature drive to initiate an "anti-graft" referendum, intended apparently as another tool to recall Chen.
Coming out of left field, that event is nevertheless heartening in two respects. First, it has signified that the KMT might have finally overcome its phobia of national referendums.
Second, referendum topics of far more significance -- such as the perennial question of "transition justice" and the nation's territorial definition -- might find a more receptive audience in the legislature.
If this ushers in an era of direct democracy in Taiwan, there might just exist a silver lining in the current political turmoil. It would represent a victory for the Taiwanese people in general and a great setback to those who instigated this wave of unrest while harboring ulterior motives against Taiwan.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats
RSS