"I can make the Queen laugh or frown!" a Chinese student boasted during an Asian students' drinks party at my flat. Then she used a ?10 note to show how she could change the Queen's expression from a big laugh into a frown simply by making two folds in the note.
"Have you tried this on Chinese money with Mao's face? How would his face look?" asked a Western guest. "Oh, let's try it! Mao's face must be very funny."
Some of the students became very excited.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
I, too, was curious to see what Mao Zedong's (
Sometimes, I have wondered if this is because no one was allowed to take photos in Mao's moody period. Or perhaps it is because no one has had the chance to steal photos showing his angry or sad expressions from the Communist party's office in Beijing, entry to which involves getting at least three red stamps and filling in forms.
So I raised my hand to tell the students that I had a Chinese note with Mao's face on it. I was stopped by the middle-aged woman next to me.
"Don't be silly, Xinran," she said. "Do not let them deface Mao, it is not good for you."
"It's just a joke," I said. "A game with young people. No one would think we were doing it for a political reason. And this is London, not China, and we are free to have our own views."
I went to get the note.
She stopped me before I could hand the note to the students.
"Do you want to go back to China again?" she asked.
"Of course," I said. "You know I go there more than twice a year."
"Do you want to be hated by the Chinese?" she said.
"You think the Chinese would hate me for playing a game with Mao's face? Do you believe they still regard Mao as God?" I said.
I was surprised by her attitude; she is, after all, a career woman living in the west, has been abroad since 1992 and has family with a Dutch man.
"You have been moulded by the Western media, which has hardly any positive press about China and the Chinese. You often go back to China, so tell me why Mao's picture still hangs on the walls of so many people's houses, shops and offices," she said. "You think it is because the Chinese government orders them to display them, or because those people have never heard Western views? Or do you think they don't know that Mao did terrible things to his people and how much he damaged his country?"
"Be honest to our history, Xinran. I know your family has lost people under Mao's cruel policies, I know your parents were sent to prison for years and you suffered in the Cultural Revolution as an orphan," she said.
"I am sorry to remind you of your unhappy memories. But don't look down on what Mao did for Chinese national pride, and for those poor parents in the early 1950s. I feel it is unfair to Mao," she said.
I stopped her.
"What about the millions of Chinese who died under his rule, because of his policies, in the 50s and 60s?" I said.
"If Westerners still believe their God is just after he flooded the world for his own purpose, or [US President] George W. Bush could invade Iraq with growing numbers of deaths for his campaign for moral good, why shouldn't Chinese believe in Mao, who did lots of positive things for the Chinese but also lost lives for his own mission for good?" she said, her voice growing angry.
"Give it to me," said a student, snatching the note from my hand.
"I told you, don't let them use Mao's face to play with!" she said.
She was so angry that she left at once.
I was so shocked by her loyalty to Mao that I couldn't enjoy the game with Mao's face and the note.
A few weeks ago I heard some news. Peasants near Beijing, who had been campaigning since 2003 to stop a power station being built on their land, were attacked and six of them were killed by an armed gang. It was said to have been arranged by corrupt local officials.
I rang a journalist friend in Beijing to ascertain exactly what had happened. He told me what he had heard from a local news report.
"Many wounded peasants held Mao's picture and cried, `This would never have happened when Mao was alive,'" he said.
All of this made me think that it would be very difficult for a lot of Chinese people to change Mao's face in their memory or in their hearts -- even in a time when their children were happy to play a game with a picture of Mao's face on a banknote that would have seen them jailed when Mao was alive.
Xinran's latest book is entitled Sky Burial.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS