Last week, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) submitted an application to the Taipei City Government to hold a campaign rally on Ketagelan Boulevard on the eve of the elections, as part of his bid for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairmanship.
This last-ditch effort by Wang is directed at Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), the other contender in the chairmanship election, and aims to question Ma's actions in dispersing the crowds that gathered on Ketagelan Boulevard following last year's presidential election, as well as draw together the KMT's "deep-blue" rank and file.
The point is whether Ma's actions in dispersing the crowd at that time have any bearing on the KMT chairmanship election campaigns.
Thus, Ma has been reluctant to touch on the issue, and has instead only made the comment that, "Whoever takes people into the street should know when to send them home as well."
Despite the election to select a new chairman, the KMT remains unable to shake off its alien nature, and the campaign continues to revolve around two core elements: One is the issue of ethnicity and the other is unification ideology.
Clearly, the importance of the former is prevailing over the latter during this election campaign.
As for one's image, ability and charisma, most only consider these to be petty conditions that any candidate needs to possess, and that these are not significant enough to outweigh the core campaign elements.
Ma, who possesses the two core elements -- the right ethnicity and unification ideology -- is unlikely to lose the race.
Wang, who was born in Taiwan, is working to strengthen his pro-unification position to get elected.
Wang has moved to distance himself from former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), vowing not to seek Taiwan's independence and stressing that he would not seek to change the national title or write a new constitution.
He even expressed willingness to follow in the footsteps of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
This is a passive approach.
A more active approach is Wang's criticism of Ma for being "wishy-washy" in dealing with the mass rallies and protests that followed last year's presidential election.
Holding a mass rally on Ketagelan Boulevard on the eve of the chairmanship election might in fact give him a boost, by telling all the blues that he is representative of "orthodox blue," effectively doing away with Ma.
Clearly, Wang has been utilizing the pro-unification ideology as part of an attempt to counter Ma's status as an important figure representing Mainlanders.
However, Ma has toed the correct political line by inviting retired generals such as Hau Pei-tsun (
In short, whichever candidate possesses the two core campaign elements will win the chairmanship.
That is why Ma seems confident, while Wang has continued to alter his tactics as different opportunities present themselves.
Tomorrow, the results of the election will indicate whether the KMT is going to change or not.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
The topic of increased intergenerational conflict has been making headlines in the past few months, showcasing a problem that would only grow as Taiwan approaches “super-aged society” status. A striking example of that tension erupted on the Taipei MRT late last month, when an apparently able-bodied passenger kicked a 73-year-old woman across the width of the carriage. The septuagenarian had berated and hit the young commuter with her bag for sitting in a priority seat, despite regular seats being available. A video of the incident went viral online. Altercations over the yielding of MRT seats are not common, but they are
RSS