Here is an interesting lesson about Taiwanese newspapers.
The background is this: former US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Randy Schriver met with Taiwanese officials and spoke to Taiwanese reporters.
In his briefing he disagreed with the characterization of China's invitations to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to visit China as "flexibility," -- something which the pan-blue media and parties have trumpeted.
Instead, he correctly characterized these moves as "more creative," which, while the Chinese increase the pressure on Chen Shui-bian (
This is not to mention the loving gaze of 800 Chinese ballistic missiles and the pan-blue forces blocking arms purchases.
These new, more creative Chinese tactics then, he asserts, are clever traps from which Taiwan must maneuver carefully. Most importantly, he characterized China as the real trouble-maker -- a phrase given to Taiwan by former US president Bill Clinton and members of his government.
The coverage:
The usually pro-blue China Times, [http://news.chinatimes. com/Chinatimes/newslist/newslist-content/0,3546,110502+112005060400021,00.html ] was quick to make sure that readers know that Schriver is "very friendly to Taiwan," and gave this fair headline: "Schriver: China is the real troublemaker."
The pan-green Taiwan Daily [http://www.taiwandaily.com.tw/index03.php?news_id=44987&datechange=2005-06-04&news_top=c1] ran a story with the headline: "Schriver: Chinese policy towards Taiwan more creative, but from international pressures and threats of invasion one cannot see `flexibility.'"
The pan-green Liberty Times [Editor's note: the Liberty Times is the Taipei Times' sister newspaper.] ran the headline: "Schriver: Hu Jintao's (
In terms of content, all the articles read relatively the same, even the China Times noted that according to Schriver, Bush's "whatever it takes" to defend Taiwan comment was genuine.
Now let's turn to the United Daily News [http://udn.com/NEWS/FINANCE/FIN2/2713746.shtml]. It tucked the story deep inside its subsidiary Economic Daily News with a headline that misleadingly read: "Schriver: Taiwan must wisely utilize Beijing's creativity."
If you spend the time to parse the grudging UDN story closely, you pretty much get the main point, which is entirely contrary to the misleading headline. The UDN also strikingly took time to emphasize that Schriver "does not think the KMT and PFP leaders meant to hurt Taiwan" with their tours of China.
Strikingly, it also omitted the "troublemaker" observation. It should be noted that UDN is the Taiwanese strategic partner of the New York Times, and the publisher of that paper happens to be visiting Taiwan.
Liang Hong-ming
Shaker Heights, Ohio
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS